Over the past few years, a trend has developed with regards to the localization of expatriates. An increasing number of organizations are either adding localization as a new element to their global mobility program or expanding on existing policy and practices—the main driver of this trend is cost containment.

As a refresher—localization is the process when an employee is moved off of the expatriate package and integrated into the host country on local terms of employment.

What Triggers Localization
Localization is usually triggered by a pre-defined limit to assignment length, most commonly three to five years. It is best to proactively address this threshold either in a global assignment policy and/or in the expatriate’s letter of assignment. By communicating a location policy early on in the assignment process, an organization can reduce unplanned or ad-hoc localizations, reduce expatriate demands and negotiations, and reduce the overall “shock” factor to employees.

What Approach to Take
There are a few different approaches to recognize when managing localizations. The first and most common approach is a straight localization, which entails immediately eliminating all expatriate benefits, e.g. housing, COLA, home leave, etc., on the effective date of localization. To execute a straight localization, it is important that the organization has a clearly defined localization process, and re-communicates the process and policy to the expatriate as early as possible. Not surprisingly, moving from a full benefit package to no additional assistance can cause great strain on the employee, especially if they have family accompanying them on the assignment.

The second approach is to phase out the expatriate package over a pre-determined length of time. The transition over to a “local” package can take anywhere from six months to two years. For example, many companies continue to pay a reduced housing allowance for six to twelve months after the effective date of localization. Other provisions that tend to be phased out in exceptional cases include education assistance and home leave.

Another approach is the lump sum approach. This involves the expatriate immediately transferring to local employment. A lump sum payment, however, is offered to the employee to alleviate some of the financial strain of localization. The lump sum can be used to cover education costs of children, assist with home finding and purchase, or to ship household goods from the home country. A lump sum approach is ideal for organizations that like to remain flexible and give their employees the freedom to decide how they want to utilize the localization assistance.

When localizing an expatriate, there are several compensation items that need to be considered. Here is a checklist to use a guideline:

1. Base salary. Should the employee be "re-priced" to the local market pay structure? Should a premium be offered for international experience? Many organizations move the employee to local salary levels. If there is an extreme difference in salary levels (either lower or higher), however, a phased-in approach is often carried out. On the other hand, oftentimes organizations justify paying an expatriate on a higher pay structure because of his/her international experience and business relationships with the home office.

2. Retirement benefits. Because retirement plans, social security and pensions do not cross national boundaries, this is often the most difficult item to transition. Often employees have expectations to remain on their home country retirement program, but unfortunately there is no typical solution to bridge the gap between country plans. Some basic alternatives include retaining the employee in a tax-qualified home country plan, simply transferring to the local plan or using an umbrella-funded plan.

3. Income taxes. Normally, the expatriate will simply transfer to the local tax system. This is not a problem for most of the world. American workers, however, are put in a difficult situation because they are taxed on a worldwide basis. Many organizations will continue the "tax equalization" process on an as-needed basis to prevent double taxation on American expatriates. Employees of other nationalities do not require such assistance.

4. Housing. It is recommended that organizations remain flexible regarding host country housing because many factors come into play when deciding how to handle housing for the expatriate. In many locations throughout the world, expatriate housing is vastly different than local standards and expectations. In some cases, it may be unreasonable to expect an expatriate to move into a local neighborhood or local style housing, e.g. Mumbai, Beijing, Jakarta, etc. Therefore, if the expatriate is moved to the local salary structure, a housing allowance may be needed to subsidize continued living in expatriate style housing. Other issues that arise with housing tax issues, family matters, property ownership laws, home search assistance and moving costs.

5. G&S differential/assignment incentives. In locations where assignees receive a G&S differential, the common practice is to immediately stop the allowance. Other options include a phase-out or lump-sum buyout, although it is rare for companies to continue to pay a G&S allowance beyond the effective localization date. Other assignment incentives such as mobility premiums, hardship allowances, etc. are also normally stopped upon conversion to local status.

6. Education for dependent children. After housing, this item is the most commonly subsidized cost after an expatriate is localized, especially if the local schools are inadequate based on international standards or if the host country language is an issue. To alleviate the problem, organizations should consider continuing education coverage, or pay a percentage of the education costs for one to two years.

7. Health care. Health care standards and costs vary greatly in different parts of the world and is a priority issue for most employees and their families. Normally, localizing employees will simply transfer into the local health care system, but concerns will arise if the health coverage in the new location is of a lower standard than in the home location. This will be a costly change for an employee coming into the United States, where typically the health care is more expensive. Because of their time spent in the host country, a localized employee will most likely be aware of the issues, and therefore be in a position to make appropriate decisions.

Finally, localization may subject the employee and the company to various employment laws and regulations that apply to employees hired by local companies. It is important to speak with a local employment counsel to understand the legal effects and ramifications of localization, including subjecting the company to stringent employment laws in some European countries.
Localizing expatriates can be a complicated process and is not as simple as transferring expatriates to a local compensation package. By having a strategic plan in place, companies can anticipate potential localization issues and make the process as efficient as possible.

The complex and rapidly changing socioeconomic and political climate in China, together with a massive shortage of skilled workers, makes human capital and global workforce development particularly challenging. As a follow-up to SIRVA's China Urban Index, released in 2006, SIRVA Relocation recently completed a study to address the lack of readily available relocation data and trending on mobility policy and practices in China. The results are documented in "The SIRVA China Mobility Report."

Thirty-seven leading global companies contributed to this unique SIRVA research initiative, the results of which have formed a valuable benchmark framework for human resources professionals to observe current key mobility policy and practices in China. This benchmark report on key findings and trends represents SIRVA Relocation's analysis of the most up-to-date data spanning seven industry sectors in both Tier 1 and Non-Tier 1 regions in China. 

Substantial differences in infrastructure and accessibility exist between Tier 1 and Non-Tier 1 regions, which companies must evaluate when creating policies to introduce employees to these varied conditions. 

Below is a check-list of key findings for this study.

Key Findings
Current Assignments: While all participating companies reported traditional international short- and long-term assignments, there is an emerging trend of new assignment types. Twenty-eight percent of companies have domestic short- and long-term and permanent one-way assignments and 33 percent of companies report permanent one-way moves into Tier 1 and Non-Tier 1 locations.

Emerging Trends and Associated Challenges: As companies in China look to expand their business with locally or regionally hired resources, rather than high-cost, international long-term assignments, it is anticipated that future permanent one-way assignments will increase more than any other assignment type. Companies have found permanent one-way assignments to be the most challenging, contradictory and controversial, making it difficult to establish a framework for policies and practices.

As a result, assignment terms and conditions are handled on a case-by-case basis due to lack of benchmarking data and experience among human resources professionals and global mobility managers. Consequently, inequalities are widening in remuneration packages as talent becomes more valuable, so new models will have to be developed to mirror evolution in emerging assignment types.

Domestic relocations are new to China. Like regionally hired permanent one-way moves, they are predicted to increase. These moves, which originate and conclude in China, are used predominantly in Non-Tier 1 cities where there is significant growth.

Cross-cultural Awareness: Most companies provide cross-cultural awareness programs to transferees: however, few companies currently enforce mandatory sessions. SIRVA expects more companies will emphasize cross-cultural training to ease the transition into Chinese culture and create an understanding of language and customs.

Assignment Administration Outsourcing: 70 percent of companies surveyed outsource assignee administration and between 86 and 92 percent outsource various assignee support services. However, companies outsource contract preparation and international compensation. SIRVA is witnessing an increased trend in companies consulting with external providers for mobility policy development due to a lack of available resources and global mobility expertise in-house.

Assignment Representation across Industries: The following graph provides a snapshot of industries and assignment types in Tier 1 and Non-Tier 1 locations. Click here to view the graph.

Of the surveyed companies, IT/telecom and petrochemical industries show the highest representations of assignee population in Tier 1, followed by manufacturing and pharmaceutical.  IT/telecom and petro-chemical industries also show the highest representations in Non-Tier 1 regions, followed by manufacturing and automotive.

The study also indicates the majority of assignments in Tier 1 and Non-Tier 1 regions are long-term and short-term assignments, followed by permanent one-way moves. 

For more information you can visit http://chinaindex.sirva.com/study.asp

The complex and rapidly changing socioeconomic and political climate in China, together with a massive shortage of skilled workers, makes human capital and global workforce development particularly challenging. As a follow-up to SIRVA's China Urban Index, released in 2006, SIRVA Relocation recently completed a study to address the lack of readily available relocation data and trending on mobility policy and practices in China. The results are documented in "The SIRVA China Mobility Report."

Thirty-seven leading global companies contributed to this unique SIRVA research initiative, the results of which have formed a valuable benchmark framework for human resources professionals to observe current key mobility policy and practices in China. This benchmark report on key findings and trends represents SIRVA Relocation's analysis of the most up-to-date data spanning seven industry sectors in both Tier 1 and Non-Tier 1 regions in China.

Substantial differences in infrastructure and accessibility exist between Tier 1 and Non-Tier 1 regions, which companies must evaluate when creating policies to introduce employees to these varied conditions.

Tier 1 includes major capital cities in China, which offer better infrastructure regarding health, housing, education, communication, access to facilities and security. Non-Tier 1 locations are generally four to six hours away from capital cities, some with very limited expatriate standard infrastructure, difficult environmental factors and obstacles relating to housing, education and health care. Beyond Tier 2 cities have minimal or no expatriate standard infrastructure in place.

Key findings of this study will be posted later this week.

We last left you with the question, “How would you, the great American consumer, buy that house?"

Even though there has been many changes in the real estate and mortgage market this past year, this is still a good time to buy a house. Home prices are starting to level off; interest rates continue to be low and financing is still available for most people, albeit different from what you may have experienced in previous years.

With all the changes to the lending criteria the past nine months, the conventional mortgage is still the preferred mortgage program and provides financing for the majority of home buyers, with a wide variety of products, solutions, rates and down payment options. Conventional financing allows choice and consumer confidence during this transitional time.

In high cost markets, typically served by jumbo mortgage products, many areas designated as high cost are eligible now for lower conforming interest rates thanks to a provision in the government stimulus package. This designation could save you hundreds of dollars off a monthly mortgage payment.

FHA financing has made a come back and is not your father’s FHA. The product’s qualifying and rates fit many consumers that may have been shut out of the conventional market due to down payment, credit or debt obligations. In addition, down payment grants are available through many sources to relieve down payment requirements. FHA products will grow substantially in acceptance and consideration this year.

For our veterans, VA financing is still abundantly available and can relieve many obstacles for veterans who want to purchase a home.

Despite all you have heard, most consumers have financing options available to them.  Which leaves us with the question, with so many financing options to choose from, when should I buy?

Avrom Goldberg
Managing Director, Asia-Pacific and the Middle East
SIRVA Relocation

Lorraine Jennings
Manager, Consulting Services, Asia-Pacific and the Middle East
SIRVA Relocation

As Avrom Goldberg and Lorraine Jennings explained, it is important for relocation professionals to stay up-to-date on relocation trends in China because of the country’s power as regional and global economic engine.  For each of the past 30 years, China has demonstrated eight to 12 percent economic growth, and it is showing no signs of slowing down.  In order to provide attendees with valuable insights and analysis of the current relocation trends in this rising economic power, Avrom and Lorraine described the findings of the SIRVA’s China Mobility Report.  While Avrom and Lorraine could not summarize the entire 95-page report during the presentation, they shared highlights of their findings.

 

Increased demand for deployment to China, one trend discussed during the presentation, is expected to continue.  However, the sources of assignees selected for deployment are changing.  Traditionally, assignees to China came from Australia, Europe, the United Kingdom and the United States.  Recently, hiring has been more concentrated in Asia, with most assignees coming in the form of returning Chinese workers or locally hired foreigners.

 

Companies who continue to send assignees to China are using a variety of selection and planning processes that do not follow a pattern.  For example, pre-assignment visits ranged from a brief three days to a full week; some companies offer extensive cross-cultural training for assignees while others do not; certain companies assign mentors, some extend mentoring programs to leadership programs, and others offer no structured mentoring to assignees in China.  In these areas of their relocation programs, companies are not following a uniform trend, but rather they are doing what is in the best interest of their individual organizations.

 

On the other hand, companies are moving in the same direction in other areas of their programs.  For example, many companies are changing their philosophies of hardship allowances.  While 51% of companies offer hardship allowances across all assignments, many are developing new ideas of what places they consider “difficult.”  Avrom and Lorraine mentioned Shanghai and Beijing as places that recently necessitated hardship allowances, but may no longer justify as high of a level of compensation.  Furthermore, many companies are shifting from a host-based to a home-based approach for hardship allowance policies, which illustrates that companies are finding a home-based method more effective in China’s current economic framework.  

 

Regardless of which specific policies and programs companies decide are most useful when sending their employees on assignments to China, the companies within SIRVA’s study agreed on the obstacles that they must overcome.  They identified the following as the top-five human resources and mobility challenges they face when filling assignments in China:

 

• Creating effective policy frameworks for separate groups, such as locally hired foreigners or international new hires who are not full assignee
• Understanding, capturing and reporting the total cost of assignments to the company, including measuring the return on investment of the assignments
• Locating quality service providers in China with a strategic vision
• Developing a young workforce with global cultural competency
• Finding credible benchmarks for hardship allowances and housing data for assignments in China

 

The Panel:

 

Maura Carey, CRP

Vice President,

Strategic Accounts

SIRVA Relocation

 

Amy Carter

Global Supply Chain Manager

Intel Corp.

 

Peggy Love

President & CEO

Full Circle International

Relocations, Inc.

 

Sandy Palmer, SCRP

Manager, Corporate Relocation

Cargill, Inc.

 

While concrete, logistical items such as household goods shipments or home marketing assistance receive priority treatment in corporate relocation programs, for employees and their families, the “soft” transitional and settling-in services can make the difference between a successful and a failed relocation. As Maura Carey and her panel discussed, the complex process of relocation is hard on the entire family, not just the employee.

 

Relocating employees and their spouses want and arguably need several “touch points” during the relocation process, where they can receive assistance ranging from the concrete (locating daycare for small children) to the less tangible (ideas for helping teenagers adjust to their new surroundings). Companies can incorporate introductions to social and job networks, school assessments and recommendations, and specialty tours of shopping and cultural areas into their relocation programs in order to ease the family’s transition. Not only are such services relevant from a comfort standpoint, but they are also important from a business perspective. Effective destination services should increase transferee acceptance rates as well as provide a tangible, differentiated benefit for recruitment and employee development.

 

In order to illustrate some of the points made during the discussion, Sandy Palmer, manager of corporate relocation for Cargill Inc., reviewed a case study. During the last four months of 2007, Cargill conducted a Transition Support Services pilot program. One key finding was that transferees and their families unequivocally enjoyed and appreciated having someone to walk them through the settling-in process, check-in frequently and assist with the “soft” transition issues early in the assignment. Amy Carter, global supply chain manager for Intel, referred to the family’s first two weeks in the new location as the “Golden Window” of opportunity to make sure that they feel comfortable in the new surroundings. Failure to achieve this comfort can sour the entire assignment or even prevent the employee from accepting a future relocation assignment. Basic “niche” services such as stocking the refrigerator prior to the family’s arrival in the new home or getting the children involved in activities immediately can help the transition, Amy explained.

 

Building on the comments of the other panel members, Peggy Love, president and CEO of Full Circle International Relocation, Inc. asserted that destination services must involve two elements, local knowledge and a focus on the adjustment process for the family. Also, she emphasized the importance of customizing the transition program for each family because the success factors vary for each family’s situation.

 

Keeping in mind that Peggy cited family concerns as the biggest reason for an employee turning down an assignment, companies cannot overlook transition services when designing their corporate relocation programs. Even domestic transferees can receive tremendous help from a one to two day orientation in their new area.  When the employee and the family experience a smooth relocation transition, it not only mitigates stress and inconvenience, but it also allows the employee to focus more quickly on the reason for the relocation in the first place: the job.

 

What transition services are your transferees and assignees asking for to support their success in the new location?

The Panel:

 

Tim Callahan

Senior Vice President,

Global Sales

SIRVA, Inc.

 

Cris Collie, CAE

Executive Vice President

Worldwide ERC

 

Paul Kinsinger

Clinical Professor of Business Intelligence

Thunderbird School of Global Management

 

Kathryn Cassidy

Vice President/General Manager,

Global Assignment Services

SIRVA Relocation

 

Andy Ironside

Global Head,

HR International Services

Deutsche Bank

 

Marita Stricklin

Director,

Relocation

Abbott

 

Before leading a panel discussion on the 2008 relocation industry outlook, Cris Collie introduced his own ideas on the topic.  Focusing on “what’s great and what’s not so great in ’08”, Cris discussed a number of factors affecting the relocation industry. He began with the housing market; Cris explained that although the media has dwelled on the poor state of the real estate market, not all markets have crashed. Furthermore, the relocation industry has the talent and skills to handle this market and must remain confident moving forward.

 

Cris also discussed today’s workforce, including the battle for acquiring workforce talent as well as the diversity of today’s four-generation workforce. While it can be difficult for companies to attract and retain talent, a lucrative relocation policy, such as one with home sale assistance, can play an important role in attracting new hires. Additionally, companies must consider the diversity within today’s workforce, which is comprised of traditionalists, baby boomers, Xs and Ys generations. Aspirations, sources of motivation, and personal characteristics vary dramatically among these generations. Companies must consider these differences when creating relocation policies in order to develop programs that will appeal to as well as be effective for their entire workforce. 

 

Additionally, Cris was adamant that we use our workforce to bring innovation into the industry and discover “what’s next?” for corporate relocation.  To illustrate his point, he cited a number of examples of missed opportunities that should have been logical next steps for companies.  For instance, why did IBM miss the chance to become Microsoft?  Why didn’t VISA or MasterCard invent PayPal?  How did NBC, CBS and ABC all fail to develop CNN?  The relocation industry must strive for innovation in order to avoid such mistakes and to grow.

 

Following further predictions and analysis of the factors affecting this year’s industry outlook, Cris opened up his discussion to an expert panel that was able to offer several valuable insights into the industry, especially from a global perspective. Of the challenges facing the relocation industry in the coming years, many stem from global events and trends. 

 

In countries with strong populations and with a seemingly endless potential workforce, such as India and China, growing pains continue. For example, as Andy noted, Deutsche Bank has experienced that 64% of new hires do not initially show up for work in India, creating a logistical nightmare. In China, where families are limited to one child by law, most children grow up without the experience of siblings or teamwork within a family. Paul pointed out that this leaves those workers less inclined towards collaboration, creating difficulties for companies who want to incorporate the Chinese into their team-oriented workforces. The panel also discussed how the supply of both low-cost manufacturing and service workers are running out in India and China, which Paul predicted will force Africa and the Middle East to join the global economy as resources for inexpensive labor. Also in relation to global mobility and the relocation industry, the panel touched upon such topics as using global relocation policy in a strategic role for business development, the effect of a possible U.S. recession on global mobility, and using more diligence in selecting global relocation suppliers.

 

In addition, the panel also provided attendees with insights into the relocation industry from a domestic standpoint, such as the high occurrence of loss-on-sale in today’s market.  As Tim noted, developing strict programs, such as those that require employees to use preferred brokers, can decrease the potential for loss-on-sale. 

 

What is your own projection for the 2008 relocation industry?

As a kick-off to my blog, A Closer Look at Global Relocation, I wanted to introduce myself and explain what I plan to discuss over the next couple months.

As a global relocation services leader, I am in contact with a variety of global mobility customers and providers on a day-to-day basis and I’ve found that there are some topics that seem to be of interest to most professionals whenever they relocate employees—be it the U.S., China or anywhere else in the world. Since I have been able to benchmark and study these highly relevant topics, I thought it would make the most sense to start this blog with some of this information. With that said, I will be initiating a discussion on barriers to assignment acceptance and how to overcome them, then I will be covering the latest trends in relocating to and within China and the true cost of an expatriate assignment, how to measure and track—all of which I feel will instigate a solid discussion on the challenges and barriers facing global mobility programs and introduce some best practices for overcoming these obstacles.

Are there any other topics that you feel would be relevant to cover? I am open to suggestions.