From commodities to services: Applying the Basics

Tuesday, February 2, 2010 by SIRVA University

Jon Gilbertson, GMS, of SIRVA, Inc. and Susan Dawson of Genworth Financial discussed principles and techniques to apply to any RFP, contract or service relationship.

When developing an RF, there are many things that need to be considered during the process. Gilbertson and Dawson highlighted that for each program in your relocation policy you should have at least three questions related to the most critical service delivery process steps.

Specifications

The specifications in an RFP for commodities convey the style, appearance and quality of the product. The goal for specification of a service is to solicit information for you to understand how the specific service’s delivery steps will be satisfied. Be sure you are clear whether defining more specifications and expectation does not result in higher costs and higher management fees.

 

Evaluating

When evaluating RFPs, it is important to identify the importance of each service criteria by weighting or rating them on a scorecard. This can be done by your evaluation team scoring the comments and evidence that the supplier has provided. Gilbertson and Dawson give two ways to evaluate the RFP – the Business Process Review (BRP) or the Conference Room Pilot.

Business Process Review

The BRP is a walkthrough of the process to gain a better understanding of the clarifying comments by reviewing the process from beginning to end, clarifying gaps or questions in the process, asses any changes required and validating the potential supplier process.

 

Conference Room Pilot

The CRP approach is a more robust validation technique that validates real life scenarios by conducting an exercise with a team that would support your business. This can be done by role playing to assess answers and questions. This will help the team identify the gaps, review the process and make changes to the procedures.

 

However, the supplier assessment process doesn’t end at the RFP! Gilbertson and Dawson outlined 4 key categories to ensure the success of your service provider – Quality, performance, cost and continuous improvement. The process is continuous and clients should consistently change their policies and expectations. Equally important to keeping your expectations consistent, it is important to be aware and track the total cost when managing and assessing a supplier. Hidden fees can easily be lost and should be critical to consider in all relocation-related expenses.

To learn more about the RFP process, check out our other sessions at www.sirvauniversity.com.

Why Home Sale Financing Incentives are Like Courting a Lady

Monday, March 30, 2009 by Paul Klemme

Home sales are complicated right now. Sellers must find a way for their home to stand out in the crowded listing space that exists today. One tool SIRVA Mortgage utilizes, to make their SIRVA Relocation listings stand out, are mortgage financing incentives. A listing with “SPECIAL FINANCING OPTIONS” in the MLS jumps out to prospective buyers. However, it must be the right incentive to work.  And that is why…

Finding the right financing incentives to sell a house is in many ways just like courting a lady. It is more art than science and several things must take place in the right combination to be successful.

You must:

  • Show interest
  • Attract attention and curiosity
  • Fit in with their interests
  • Invite her friends
  • Impress the parents


First, showing interest is critical whether getting a women’s attention or selling a house. Just as important is the speed at which you do it. Incentives should be put on as soon as the house is listed. The longer it takes to put an incentive on the more likely you have missed a buyer—the sooner the better.

Second, you will need to do something significant to attract attention. Cheap out and lose out. Significant does not mean expensive, it means quality attention getter. Being creative will add value and impress more than something commonplace.

Incentives should fit the interests of those you are seeking. Each home has a unique market that will attract buyers with certain needs. For example, maybe consider offering reduced closing costs for lower priced homes, lower interest rates for middle priced homes, temporary interest rate buydowns for higher-end homes or home improvement gift cards for the fixer-upper. Finding the right incentive can do wonders when trying to drive traffic into the home.Next, you should invite friends and all interested parties. Along with the transferee, the relocation counselor and realtor play a key role in making sure the home is listed correctly and with the right incentives. When everyone is involved, good things happen.Finally, you should impress the parents. The corporate client and the client contact are like the parents. By selling the home quickly, the costs of temporary housing, travel, duplicate housing and the possibility of going to a costly buyout are reduced. Additionally, the opportunity to earn a home sale bonus, if one is offered, increases along with the likelihood of a successful relocation. With the parents on board, success follows.

If you have questions on financing incentives please e-mail us at MortgageFacilitators@sirva.com , we would be happy to help. 

Five Refinance Challenges That You Should Know About

Wednesday, February 25, 2009 by Paul Klemme

It’s a new lending world from the last time you obtained a mortgage loan. Here are some challenges the refinance market has in store for you.

Home Value
With the decrease in market values in just about every market, your home may not be worth what you think or what you need it to appraise for. Depending on your particular situation, you may not qualify or your loan terms may be different due to a lower appraised value that can cause a higher loan-to-value ratio. 

Loan Requirements
Qualifying for a loan is tougher than ever. Guidelines around higher cash reserves, higher credit scores and lower debt-to-income ratios have become standard. In addition, documentation around income is being required.  
 
Cash Out Refinances
Qualifying for taking cash or equity from your home is considerably more difficult and more costly with rates up to .75% higher on these loans. Expect less available cash due to lower home values and tighter lending restrictions.

Tangible Net Benefit
Regulations in many states require a clear tangible net benefit to be provided to the consumer when refinancing. Tangible net benefits are documented proof by your lender that your situation will improve under this new loan. For instance your interest rate going from 7 percent to 5 percent without excessive closing costs would be a tangible net benefit. 

Choosing the Right Provider
There are significant differences in rates, closing costs, up-front fees, programs and on-time closing by provider. You should shop providers carefully to find the best combination to fit your needs.

The refinance market space can still help many home owners save thousands of dollars. Know what you are getting into, do your homework and be realistic about what you can achieve.

SIRVA Mortgage also provides a free consultation to any transferee to compare Good Faith Estimates (GFE). The consultation will ensure the transferee has “apples to apples” comparison on refinance options. 

For more information visit http://www.sirva.com/CorpRelo_Mortgage_Landing.aspx
 

Are Home Sale Benefits Collectible From Transferees Under a Payback Agreement?

Wednesday, February 18, 2009 by hank roth

Even before the current economic crisis, a majority of companies required transferees to sign repayment agreements, under which the employee agrees to repay relocation benefits if they leave the company within some specified period after being transferred.

Such agreements commonly include a requirement to repay costs that were incurred by the employer to acquire and dispose of the employee’s home in the departure location under a home purchase program. Such costs are usually the largest part of the expenses incurred to move the employee. 
If a home purchase program is properly organized and implemented, IRS agrees that costs incurred are not taxable to the employee. See Rev. Rul. 2005-74. However, employers sometimes express concern that inclusion of those costs in a repayment agreement is somehow inconsistent with the original exclusion of the costs from income.

That concern is not well-founded. 

A repayment agreement simply imposes a condition on the employer’s willingness to undertake the expense of moving the employee. It does not operate to characterize any of the expenses as employee benefits, either taxable or not taxable. The company incurred many costs to move the employee, some taxable and some not (for example, moving household goods). Under the repayment agreement the employee simply acknowledges that the employer expects a return on its investment in moving the employee. The benefit to the employer of incurring the costs will not be realized if the employee accepts relocation but then leaves employment within a short period of time.

Requiring the employee to repay such costs does not in any way suggest or imply that the costs were incurred to benefit the employee. Indeed, as discussed in the previous paragraph, it tends to suggest just the opposite. 

Moreover, when the employee does repay the home sale costs, the employee in effect has simply paid his or her own costs of home sale. There is no benefit to the employee at all, taxable or nontaxable. 

Consequently, including home sale costs in a repayment agreement should not be taken as suggesting that such costs were a taxable employee benefit in the first instance. 

However, as with all other costs included in a repayment agreement, the agreement should clearly specify the categories of cost that are subject to the agreement. Doing so will help the company to enforce the agreement, if that becomes necessary.

Reprinted from the Worldwide ERC Tax and Legal Mastersource with permission. Article prepared by Peter K. Scott, ERC Tax Counsel.

Check the Health of your Global Mobility Program

Wednesday, February 4, 2009 by Julian Yates


Some companies have very sophisticated well-thought-through global mobility programs that have been tried and tested for many years. Others are stepping into the global arena for the first time. Either way it doesn’t hurt to check the health of your global mobility program and consider what I would believe to be the 10 best practices to ensure your global relocation program is a successful one.

10 Best Practices to Ensure a Successful Global Relocation

  1. Policy
    1. Make sure you have a formal global policy in place that has been reviewed by your global relocation provider for competitiveness and efficiency and bench-marked against industry standards.Candidate Selection
  2. Candidate Selection
    1. Utilize pre-decision surveys or interviews to ensure that your candidate is flexible, adaptable and ready to take on the challenge of an international assignment.
  3. Benchmark
    1. Keep up-to-date as situations change, trends develop, and new products come to market.
  4. Cost Estimates
    1. In today’s economic environment it’s prudent to have a cost estimate completed before sending someone on an assignment so you have an idea how much it is going to cost.
  5. Cost Analysis
    1. Know what you’re spending and what policy changes or exceptions are costing or saving money. There are many examples of companies focusing on elements that are inexpensive and denying them, while allowing exceptions for other elements that are very expensive.
  6. Track Exceptions
    1. Be sure to always track any policy exception that was made or declined and the cost of that exception. This will help you be consistent in how you treat other exception requests in the future.
  7. Use Proven Providers
    1. Proven providers can give you good advice on all elements of a global relocation and can make the process easier for you.
  8. Don’t Cut Corners to Reduce Costs
    1. There is usually a good reason to do something well.
  9. Create a Repatriation and Reintegration Plan Well Before the Assignment Ends!
    1. If you don’t, you may risk losing a valuable employee. Statistics show that up to 70 percent of repatriated assignees leave their employer within two years, usually to join a competitor.

For more information on the above global mobility program components and services, please contact SIRVA Relocation for a consultation.

 

Employer-provided Relocation Loans

Wednesday, January 21, 2009 by hank roth

In today’s precarious economy, many employers are considering giving relocation loans to employees. Several of these employers may not have provided relocation loans to employees before, but are now looking for ways to increase the opportunity to make such loans available.  .

A relocation loan that is done correctly can be offered to the employee interest-free and without exposure to creating imputed interest to the employee which would be treated by the Internal Revenue Service as compensation income.

The following information concerning below market rate loans is an excerpt from an article published by the Worldwide Employee Relocation Council® (ERC) in its Tax and Legal MasterSource:

A. Types of relocation loans

1. Mortgage loans

A mortgage loan is extended by the employer to the employee with the understanding that the employee will use the proceeds of the loan to purchase a new principal residence. Such loan may be a demand or term loan, and is conditioned on the future performance of substantial services for the employer. The loan may have a market interest rate, a below market interest rate, or no interest at all.

2. Equity bridge loans

A loan may be offered to an employee in order to enable the employee to receive the equity out of an old unsold residence to make the down payment on a new residence. The terms of the loan may require that the proceeds be repaid within a short time after the sale of the former residence. The loan may have a market interest rate, or a below market interest rate, or no interest at all.

B. Imputation of interest on a loan transaction

1. Explanation of imputed interest

When a loan is made at a below market interest rate, or with no interest at all, the Internal Revenue Code may impute interest to the loan even though the lender and borrower never did. If imputed interest rules apply to an employee relocation loan, the amount by which a market rate of interest exceeds the loan’s actual rate of interest is considered income to the employee borrower. (The market rate used is the "applicable federal rate," which is computed by the IRS under a formula in the Internal Revenue Code and periodically adjusted.) This income is considered to be derived from the employer-lender, because the employer-lender is considered to have paid interest on the loan to itself on behalf of the employee-borrower.

2. An example of imputed interest

An example of imputed interest may be helpful in understanding this complex area. Assume that the employer has made an interest-free bridge loan to the employee. The market rate of interest on the loan would be $100 per month if interest were charged by the employer-lender. No interest is paid by the employee-borrower or received by the employer-lender. However, the tax law considers the employee-borrower to have owed $100 of interest, and since the employee’s obligation to pay this $100 was satisfied by the employer-lender, the transaction is treated as though the employer-lender paid $100 per month to the employee-borrower, who then repaid it to the employer-lender. This characterization of the transaction gives rise to $100 per month of compensation income to the employee-borrower.

3. Reporting requirements for imputed interest

The employee-borrower must report imputed income on his/her tax return, even though the employee never received it, but then may be entitled to a corresponding deduction for the interest theoretically paid on the employee’s behalf by the employer-lender.

4. Negative tax consequences of imputed interest

If interest is imputed to loans it has negative tax consequences for the employer-lender and may have for the employee-borrower. The employer-lender must pay payroll taxes (FICA, RRTA, and FUTA) on the amounts imputed as interest income to the employee-borrower. (The employer-lender, however, does not have to withhold federal income taxes on the imputed interest income.) The employee-borrower may or may not be eligible for a deduction of the imputed interest. The interest on a mortgage or bridge loan may be deductible as "qualified residence interest" under the general rules applicable to homeowners. However, there may be situations in which interest income is imputed to the employee, but the employee is unable to take a corresponding interest deduction. For example, there is a $100,000 limit on the amount of home equity debt upon which interest is deductible.

C. Avoidance of imputed interest

1. De minimis exception

If the total principal amount of the employer’s mortgage loan, bridge loan, or both outstanding to the employee does not exceed $10,000 during the year, the loans are ex-empted from the imputed interest rules due to their small size. No interest will be imputed in this situation.

2. Exemption for employee relocation loans under regulation 1.7872-5T

Under a temporary regulation, imputed interest will not apply to compensation-related mortgage or bridge loans if the following requirements are met:

      a. Exemption for mortgage loans

          The loan agreement must require the following provisions:

i. The proceeds of the loan must be used only to purchase the new residence.

ii. Such loans must be secured by a mortgage on the new principal residence acquired in connection with the relocation of the employee to a new principal place of work.

iii. The loan must be a demand or term loan.

iv. The benefits of the interest arrangements must not be transferable.

v. The below market interest rate (or the lack of interest) must be conditioned on the future performance of substantial services by the employee.

vi. The employee must certify to the employer that the employee reasonably expects to itemize deductions for each year the loan is outstanding.

     b. Exemption for bridge loans

The terms of the bridge loan must meet all the requirements for the mortgage loan as stated above except for the security requirement. Note, however, that any interest actually charged on a bridge loan will not be deductible by the transferee unless the loan is secured by either the old or new residence. In addition, the bridge loan agreement must provide that the loan is payable in full within 15 days after the sale of the employee’s immediately former principal residence. The aggregate of the principal amount of all outstanding bridge loans must not be greater than the employer’s reasonable estimate of the equity in the former residence. The former residence must not be converted to business or investment use.

     c. An unresolved issue

One issue that remains unresolved under the temporary regulation is whether the exemption applies in situations where imputed interest would not be deductible under the general rules applicable to home mortgage loan interest deductions. This problem is particularly acute for bridge loans, which are often unsecured by either the old or new residence, and, even if secured by the old residence may be considered home equity loans, and therefore limited to $100,000 of principal on which interest would be deductible. Although the IRS has not spoken to this issue, it is arguable that the 1986 Tax Reform Act, which imposed the current limitations on deductibility of interest, would be held to modify the exemption contained in the temporary regulation. However, in the absence of any IRS statement of position, it should be assumed that the regulation may still be relied upon. The IRS continues to follow the regulation, and has shown no interest in revisiting it.

 

Loss-on-Sale Assistance: A Necessity in Today's Risky Real Estate Environment

Tuesday, January 20, 2009 by David Barlow

 The current real estate market continues to drive home values down significantly, frequently resulting in sellers being unable to sell their homes for more than the original purchase price. This situation adds financial strain on transferees and leads to loss-on-sale, namely the difference between what a home sells for in relation to the price at which it was purchased.

Today, companies are taking measures to assist transferees by modifying their loss-on-sale programs to reflect the continuing deterioration in the housing markets. If companies currently do not have a loss-on-sale program in place, they are working to add these elements into their policies in order to help protect transferees from significant home value loss.

In this month's Policy Matters, SIRVA provides an inside look at the following aspects of designing and implementing a successful loss-on-sale program:  

Evaluate New Programs: Before implementing a loss-on-sale program, companies should always perform necessary due diligence on which program benefits should be offered, keeping consistent with a company's financial situation and industry best practices.

Re-evaluate Existing Programs: For companies that already have a loss-on-sale program in place, now is a good time to re-evaluate current program benefits to ensure overall effectiveness in today's real estate market.

Identify Other Contributing Factors: In this down real estate market, transferees could potentially be not only in a loss-on-sale situation but also subject to negative equity, which would need to be addressed before the home sale can proceed.

Read the complete article now.

 
 
 
 
 

Some Employees Unwilling to Relocate in the Current Real Estate Market

Thursday, January 8, 2009 by SIRVA Relopinion

We all know that real estate is local. However-in our current real estate situation-we are seeing more markets continue to see a slip in home sales with only a few who are reporting an increase. The National Association of Realtors (NAR) reports areas such as Colorado Springs, Colo., Sacramento, Calif. and Spartanburg, S.C. are experiencing double-digit pending sales gains compared to a year ago with a significant percentage of these sales attributed to investors who are buying foreclosed properties. So while some markets have seen tremendous growth in home sales compared to last year, others have seen contract signings slashed by as much as 50 percent.

The current real estate market for the typical residential home is still very much a buyer's market. Attractive interest rates, large inventories of homes for sale and lower-than-average sale prices make it a great time to buy. Sellers aren't so fortunate. In fact, some areas have seen home values drop so low that typically willing transferees are hesitant to take a corporate relocation because of loss-on-sale concerns or owing more on their properties than the current market value sales price.

According to a recent survey conducted by the Worldwide ERC®, the number one reason employees are reluctant to relocate is a direct effect of the troubled real estate market. The survey indicated that more than 95 percent of respondents reported "slowed real estate appreciation at the old location," as the reason their employees are averse to moving. This is a stark contrast from last year when only 16 percent cited the real estate market as the reason for their reluctance. Instead, high housing costs, high cost-of-living and family resistance to move, were top concerns.

"Today, it's an unfortunate fact that those true soldiers that have faithfully relocated every two to three years are cooling to the idea because of the economy and the fear that they will take a considerable home loss-on-sale," says David Barlow, SIRVA's senior consultant. 

Barlow advises companies that have not done so to consider implementing a loss-on-sale policy to remain competitive and to help their transferees with the reality of falling home values and sale prices. He also advises companies that already have a loss-on-sale policy to re-evaluate the loss-on-sale limit or cap to ensure it is sufficient in today's difficult real estate market.

It's no secret that the current real estate market has had a significant impact on the relocation industry. Companies have had to reevaluate and update their corporate relocation policies to overcome the challenges of the current market.

Barlow doesn't wager a guess on when the market will turn, but he expects companies will be working through the challenges of the current real estate market for some time to come.
 

Effects of Exchange Rate Movement on Expatriate Compensation

Tuesday, December 23, 2008 by Julian Yates


In case you haven’t noticed there have been some significant exchange rate movements in the past few months due to the global financial crisis that is churning. International HR professionals are well aware of this and so are expatriates whose compensation packages appear to be impacted by such movements.

For example, the U.S. dollar has declined significantly since late 2006; it then rebounded abruptly in the Fall of 2008. Five currencies have experienced noticeable changes in the last two months, the Australian Dollar (AUD), the Brazilian Real (BRL), the Canadian Dollar (CAD), the British Pound (GBP) and the South-Korean Won (KRW).

So what should companies do about this? First, they should use specialist third party organizations such as ORC and Air Inc. to provide advice on cost-of-living data and other related information to help provide accurate solutions. These companies use complex formulas to track cost-of-living and related exchange rates to minimize the negative financial impact that currency fluctuations can have on expatriates living under one currency but being remunerated in another currency. 

Such currency volatility is not unprecedented, and urgent action is not normally required as long as allowances and payments are reviewed frequently; for example moving to a quarterly review may be worth considering. Only where inflation is running out of control should exchange rates be considered more frequently (e.g. Zimbabwe), but in these extreme cases, a local currency should be avoided if possible.

Below are some solutions that should be considered:

  • Quarterly reviews of allowances and payments made in an affected currency
  • Consider a split pay approach that would deliver a combined goods and services amount normally spent at home, plus a goods and services differential in the host currency
  • Communicate with expatriates, to show how their purchasing power is being protected

For assistance in reviewing your company’s global mobility policies and process related to expatriate compensation, please contact SIRVA.

Fixed-fee Relocation Home Sale Programs Improve Predictability and Reduce Real Estate Risk in Slow Housing Market

Thursday, December 18, 2008 by SIRVA Relopinion



The U.S. housing market is continuing to slow, and most economists and housing professionals predict the housing slump will linger longer than previously forecasted.

A downturn in real estate markets creates several challenges for employers' relocating transferees, the most significant of which is the growing number of homes that end up in inventory. This rise in home inventory leads to higher overall relocation costs and increased property management duties for employers.

Total home sale costs also become less predictable in sluggish real estate markets, and unpredictable home sale costs translate into unpredictable total relocation costs.

Relocation service providers (RSPs) offer several home sale programs, each with varying levels of risk, to help corporate relocation transferees. Employers should consider the advantages and disadvantages of each program to determine the level of risk involved, and those employers who want a predictable and low-risk home sale program should consider a fixed-fee program.

Learn more about the fixed-fee program.

SIRVA Names David Byers as Chief Commercial Officer

Monday, December 8, 2008 by SIRVA Relopinion



On December 5, 2008, SIRVA announced the appointment of David Byers as the Company’s new chief commercial officer. Byers brings more than two decades of operations, marketing, sales and brand management experience from H&R Block and Foote, Cone&Belding Inc. to SIRVA.

“David’s deep knowledge base in financial products and services, and his experience in developing and managing brands will help drive our relocation services business,” said SIRVA President and Chief Executive Wes Lucas. “Similarly, his background working with distribution networks will bring tremendous value to our moving business.”

Byers was with H&R Block for eight years and progressed quickly through the ranks, from senior vice president and global chief marketing officer to senior vice president of U.S. operations, and most recently, chief operating officer of retail tax services. In these roles, he was responsible for H&R Block’s U.S. operations, sales and business development functions, which comprised more than 13,000 retail locations and 100,000 employees. Prior to H&R Block, Byers’ career included working for global advertising agency Foote, Cone & Belding Inc., Del Monte Corporation, and most recently, he served as chief executive officer of The Mutual Fund Store.

See Press Release
 

SIRVA Relocation Ranks 2nd in Performance & Satisfaction Among Top 6 Largest Relocation Providers

Tuesday, November 25, 2008 by SIRVA Relopinion

According to the Trippel Survey&Research LLC Seventh Annual Relocation Managers Survey: Relocation Management Company Industry©, SIRVA Relocation ranked second in overall performance and satisfaction among the industry’s top six largest relocation companies. The company achieved the highest scores among the six largest relocation providers in eight of the 24 areas surveyed, and it also placed as one of the top three providers in 22 out of 24 areas surveyed among the largest relocation providers. SIRVA Relocation LLC is a subsidiary of SIRVA Inc., a leading global relocation services provider.

“These results are a direct reflection of our steadfast commitment to providing our customers with unparalleled service and value every day,” said SIRVA Inc. CEO Wes Lucas. “Our goal is to be the most trusted and sought-after relocation services provider in the industry based on the work we do and solutions we offer. I am elated to see that customers are recognizing the value we bring to the table.”

Trippel Survey&Research conducted this survey—which launched September 12 and concluded October 1—with the goal of obtaining evaluations from corporate relocation managers regarding levels of satisfaction with firms in the relocation industry. More than 300 survey evaluations—representing 298 different relocation management companies—were received. The six largest relocation management companies in the survey accounted for nearly 75 percent of all evaluations returned.

Categories in which SIRVA Relocation achieved the top score included: Responsiveness and flexibility to your needs; Service recovery; Year-end tax reporting; Management reporting; Identifying trends and responding to them; Suggesting policy recommendations; Suggesting ways to reduce your costs; and Taking actions that control or lower direct real estate costs.

SIRVA Appoints Senior Vice President, Operational Excellence, People & Infrastructure

Friday, November 14, 2008 by SIRVA Relopinion

On November 6, 2008, SIRVA announced the appointment of Sean Fernandez as the company’s new senior vice president, operational excellence, people and infrastructure. Fernandez brings 19 years of leadership, operations and consulting experience to SIRVA. He will report to SIRVA President and Chief Executive Officer Wes Lucas, and work from SIRVA’s office in Fort Wayne, Ind.

Fernandez is a proven global executive with an excellent track record in improving business performance and growing companies. Specifically, he has driven improvements in operations, quality and customer satisfaction. In his new role, Fernandez is responsible for overseeing SIRVA’s global operational excellence initiative, building strong teams and a high-performance organization and enhancing information technology capability. This position includes the development and implementation of key process improvements designed to drive customer satisfaction, cost efficiencies and improved quality.

“We are delighted to welcome Sean to the SIRVA team,” said Wes Lucas. “He is an outstanding leader and brings valuable operational capabilities, process improvement skills, product management and a proven ability to grow companies. I am confident that he will play an integral role in helping our company to serve our global customer base.”

See full press release

SIRVA Appoints Gordon Smith as Chief Financial Officer

Thursday, November 13, 2008 by SIRVA Relopinion


On November 6, 2008, SIRVA announced the appointment of Gordon Smith as the Company’s new chief financial officer. Mr. Smith, who will work from the Company’s Westmont, Ill., headquarters, brings more than 31 years of financial leadership experience from GE Capital and Asbury Automotive Group to SIRVA. He will report to SIRVA President and Chief Executive Officer Wes Lucas.

“We take great pleasure in welcoming Gordon to the SIRVA team,” said Wes Lucas. “A highly capable and proven finance executive, with outstanding financial leadership experience, Gordon is ideal to lead SIRVA’s financial areas as we build on our strong financial position, deliver outstanding service to our clients, grow our business and continue to create the world’s premier corporate relocation and moving services company.”

See full press release

The Importance of Cross Culture Awareness in an International Relocation

Friday, November 7, 2008 by SIRVA Relopinion

Global
While globalization has opened many opportunities for business, it has created some significant challenges. One leading challenge for global managers is learning to understand and appreciate cultural values, practices, and various nuances in different parts of the world. Experts in international business agree that to succeed in global business, managers should be open to others’ ideas and opinions and have the flexibility to respond positively and effectively to practices and values that are oftentimes drastically different from what they are accustomed to. Cultural training has been shown to improve an individual’s relationships with host nationals and allows expatriates to adjust more rapidly to a new culture and an international relocation.

There are a variety of training techniques that prepare people for foreign work assignments. They range from documentary programs that merely expose people to a new culture through materials about the country’s sociopolitical history, geography, economics, language and cultural institutions, to intense interpersonal-experience training, in which individuals participate in role-playing exercises, simulated social settings and similar experiences in order to “feel” the differences in new culture. Successful cross-cultural programs can include the following:

Local business etiquette. Even the most veteran and prolific employee can have difficulty without an understanding of business etiquette in other cultures. For example, the U.S. tendency to “get down to business” is regarded as rude in Japan, where business transactions often have a greater personal relationship component. An employee who appears impatient with Japanese traditions designed to establish friendship and trust will have little success in business negotiations.

Cultural biases. International relocation assignees should always examine the way their own culture affects their perceptions of right and wrong, good and bad manners, values, dress, and other customs. Cultural training can improve understanding of the cultural forces that affect their own behaviors and help assignees learn how to adapt to new cultural demands and the international relocation.

Customized training. Additional training can include special modules to help the employee and his or her family with their own individual concerns. For example, if the assignee’s children will be attending local schools, modules and resources on education etiquette would be appropriate.

To learn more, please visit our resource library

Some Employees Unwilling to Relocate in the Current Real Estate Market

Friday, October 24, 2008 by SIRVA Relopinion

We all know that real estate is local. However—in our current real estate situation—we are seeing more markets continue to see a slip in home sales with only a few who are reporting an increase. The National Association of Realtors (NAR) reports areas such as Colorado Springs, Colo., Sacramento, Calif. and Spartanburg, S.C. are experiencing double-digit pending sales gains compared to a year ago with a significant percentage of these sales attributed to investors who are buying foreclosed properties. So while some markets have seen tremendous growth in home sales compared to last year, others have seen contract signings slashed by as much as 50 percent.

The current real estate market for the typical residential home is still very much a buyer’s market. Attractive interest rates, large inventories of homes for sale and lower-than-average sale prices make it a great time to buy. Sellers aren’t so fortunate. In fact, some areas have seen home values drop so low that typically willing transferees are hesitant to relocate because of loss-on-sale concerns or owing more on their properties than the current market value sales price.

According to a recent survey conducted by the Worldwide ERC®, the number one reason employees are reluctant to relocate is a direct effect of the troubled real estate market. The survey indicated that more than 95 percent of respondents reported "slowed real estate appreciation at the old location," as the reason their employees are averse to moving. This is a stark contrast from last year when only 16 percent cited the real estate market as the reason for their reluctance. Instead, high housing costs, high cost-of-living and family resistance to move, were top concerns.

"Today, it’s an unfortunate fact that those true soldiers that have faithfully relocated every two to three years are cooling to the idea because of the economy and the fear that they will take a considerable home loss-on-sale," says David Barlow, SIRVA’s senior consultant. 

Barlow advises companies that have not done so to consider implementing a loss-on-sale policy to remain competitive and to help their transferees with the reality of falling home values and sale prices. He also advises companies that already have a loss-on-sale policy to re-evaluate the loss-on-sale limit or cap to ensure it is sufficient in today’s difficult real estate market.

"In the past, $25,000 was a typical loss-on-sale cap, but today that figure is increasing and could approach $75,000," he explains.

Negative Equity a Grim Reality
While many companies are struggling with situations where transferees are not willing to relocate because of a significant loss-on-sale, others are dealing with a less common but potentially even more difficult scenario— is trying to relocate employees who have negative equity in their home.

Barlow explains that SIRVA is seeing this problem grow from what used to be a very low percentage of relocation candidates, which is a definite sign of the times.

Negative equity comes into play when a home’s value is less than the amount of all outstanding debts against the home. This can happen if an individual takes out a line of credit, second mortgage or other loan on his or her home, which must be paid before the home can close. It can also happen if the home’s value has decreased below the value of the original mortgage. This can occur with low or no money down loan products that were prevalent in the last 5-10 years.
 
"If a transferee purchased a home for $350,000 two years ago, and in today’s real estate market that home is only worth and sells for $325,000, then the owner is looking at a $25,000 loss on sale," explains Barlow. "This situation would generally be covered in whole or in part by a loss-on-sale policy. However, if the same individual also took out a $50,000 home equity loan (in addition to a $300,00 first mortgage), then he or she is now on the hook for whatever portion the company does not cover in the loss-on-sale benefit.  If the first mortgage and the line of credit is greater than the net proceeds of the sale of the home plus the loss-on-sale benefit then the homeowner is in a negative equity situation or is considered to be ‘upside down’.

"If the homeowner can’t repay this total debt at the home closing, the home can’t be sold. This is a significant issue in corporate relocation because all obligations have to be cleared when closing the sale of the home, and if the individual can’t clear the obligation and sell the home, the relocation can’t proceed."

SIRVA’s Solution
SIRVA works closely with companies to minimize the risks of relocating individuals with negative equity. SIRVA counselors are trained to ask the right questions and uncover negative equity situations in the discovery phase, before the relocation is initiated.

"If we determine a relocation candidate will be in a negative equity situation then we can alert our clients who will then have to make some tough decisions," explains Barlow. "The best course of action may be to select another candidate."

Barlow says the last course of action a company should take is to settle the negative equity obligation for the employee in the form of a lump-sum payment.

"Our counsel has always been against paying the negative equity to the employee. Imagine the potential equity issues if an employee were to find out the company settled a colleague’s unique financial obligation. This could create more problems than it solves," he says. "Consider the similar transferee who did not take out an equity line who would—in effect—be penalized for his/her conservative financial management." 

Instead, Barlow advises companies that absolutely have to relocate a high-value employee with negative equity to consider a loan—rather than just cutting a check—for the outstanding debt.

"Companies can give transferees the opportunity to pay the loan back or use it as a retention device, forgiving portions of the loan over time," adds Barlow. "Companies could also consider a temporary domestic assignment or home-retention allowance. Either would allow the company to relocate an individual with negative equity by not selling the home and thus not having to deal with the debt obligations during the relocation process.

Barlow emphasizes how important it is to identify negative equity transferees before relocations are initiated.

"This is one of the ways SIRVA’s consulting services can help companies execute their relocation programs while minimizing the risks of the current real estate market," he continues. "Our obligation is to work with clients to identify every possible course of action in order to make a relocation happen."* It’s no secret that the current real estate market has had a significant impact on the relocation industry. Companies have had to re-evaluate and update their corporate relocation policies to overcome the challenges of the current market.

Barlow doesn’t wager a guess on when the market will turn, but he expects companies will be working through the challenges of the current real estate market for some time to come.

Buying a House Before You Sell Your Existing Home

Wednesday, October 8, 2008 by Paul Klemme

Last month I posted a story about Mr. Jones who worked through a short sale situation.  This month we highlight Mr. Johnson who lives a few doors down from Mr. Jones.

Mr. Johnson has had his house listed for 120 days. Home values continue to decline and there are few buyers in the market. Mr. Johnson has received considerable pressure from his new manager to get moved and settled into his destination city. Mr. Johnson isn’t sure what he should do or what solutions may be available to him.

This relocation situation has become more common in today's market. With the tightening of qualifying guidelines, available options have become limited in the past year. The current solutions include:

  • Qualify with both the existing home and the new home mortgage payments
  • Rent the existing home
  • Hold off from buying until the existing home is sold

Qualifying with both house payments
If a current residence is under contract for sale but has not yet closed, and a transferee is purchasing in the destination city, both the current and the proposed payments must be used in qualifying for the new mortgage loan. In addition, loan underwriting guidelines will require:

  • Minimum cash reserves of six months principal, interest, taxes and insurance (PITI) for both properties if the equity in the existing residence is less than 30 percent
  • Minimum cash reserves of two months principal, interest, taxes and insurance (PITI) for both properties if the equity in the existing residence is 30 percent or more

Underwriting guidelines will not require the PITI of the existing home to be counted against the transferee if:

  • The above cash reserve requirement is met
  • The current residence is under an executed sales contract
  • There is confirmation that any financing contingency has been cleared**

    ** Guaranteed purchase offer agreements can be used to replace executed
    contracts with outside buyers in the case of a relocation loan. The purchase offer must be guaranteed and agreement must be in force.

Renting the existing home
Lending underwriting guidelines allow up to 75 percent of the rental income to be used to offset the current mortgage payment for qualifying purposes if all of the following requirements are met:

  • There is documented equity of at least 30 percent in the current property (derived from an appraisal, AVM or BPO less all outstanding liens)
  • There is a fully executed 12 month lease agreement
  • There is a copy of the security deposit from the tenant and confirmation of deposit into the borrower’s account

If the 30 percent equity in the property cannot be documented, the rental income may not be used to offset the mortgage payment. Both the current and the proposed payments must be used to qualify for the new transaction and six months of PITI for both properties would need to be in cash reserves.

Hold off buying until your existing home sells
This is the option we see most transferees accept. Unfortunately, with the decline in the real estate market and decrease in home sales—we see relocation fatigue, an increase in temporary living costs and cancelled moves. Staying consistent with your communication messages to transferees is important during the listing period. Encouraging aggressive marketing tactics and active involvement with the listing agent will help the transferee through this time. See David Barlow’s blog on Navigating the Real Estate Market for more information.

After reviewing his options Mr. Johnson’s next concern is his down payment. We will look at the possible solutions for a down payment next month and see how Mr. Johnson is progressing with his move.

Why a bailout?

Tuesday, October 7, 2008 by Paul Klemme


There has been a lot of news on the government bailout of financial institutions that are burdened with bad debt. Although difficult to comprehend how we got here, a non-partisan explanation and impact on relocation may be helpful.

First, let’s understand what the bailout is and is not. The official name is the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) and is the largest financial assistance since the great depression. It is intended to reduce non-performing assets (loans) of financial institutions. The most common non-performing loans are those which have been foreclosed upon or where the owner is struggling to pay the mortgage payment. By the government buying troubled assets from these institutions, the market can regain confidence in the institutions and the credit markets and begin to improve the credit flow that has been restricted recently due to weakened balance sheets. If left unaddressed the flow of credit and liquidity to the market will be shut off collapsing the free flow of capital—creating world wide business failures and an economic depression.

The function of TARP would be to clean up and renegotiate payments for struggling home owners as well as dispose of failing assets for financial institutions. Any asset that was sold under this program would be considered income and offset the money advanced for this program. We should expect two or more years of this activity to clean up those assets.

A few statements of what the bailout is not. It is not a mechanism to give unsecured cash to troubled companies. It is not giving away the asset it is trying to sell. It is not a way to give excessive executive pay. It is not funding the $700 billion up-front.

The impact on relocation will be immediate. By providing confidence in the credit markets, the real estate market will improve and stimulate additional home sale activity and reduce the fall in real estate prices. Additionally, lenders will continue to have mortgage products and the funds to lend, which will support the real estate market. Corporations will have confidence in the economy and will begin to expand, further driving growth. Without this bailout the world economy and markets could collapse in a way not seen since the 1930’s.

Cross Culture Awareness: Cross-Cultural Training

Monday, October 6, 2008 by SIRVA Relopinion
In recent years, researchers have attempted to isolate the criteria that most contributes to the success of the expatriate assignments. Three areas have been identified: assignee’s ability, knowledge, and personality. While ability and knowledge can be “trained”, personality is an innate trait and, therefore, more difficult to influence. Cultural training has been shown to improve an individual’s relationships with host nationals and allows expatriates to adjust more rapidly to a new culture. Successful cross-cultural programs can include the following:

Cultural variances
This part of a cultural program compares and contrasts the expatriate’s culture of origin with the culture of assignment. For example, in Australia, people are quick to address one another by their first names, while in France, such informality can be insulting.

Cultural profile
In this part of cultural training, employees develop personal cultural profiles that indicate their positions in relation to their larger national culture, since people who come from the same society do not necessarily all behave in the same way. The cultural profile helps expatriates determine how to develop an effective behavior to adapt to the host country’s culture.

Role play and simulations
Role play and simulations help expatriates apply the lessons they have learned to new situations they will likely encounter. Training not only includes the situations that might come up in the workplace, but also those situations the expatriate (and his or her family) might encounter in daily life.

How SIRVA Can Assist With Group Moves

Tuesday, September 30, 2008 by SIRVA Relopinion


If you have a group move to manage and are seeking assistance, SIRVA Relocation is able to provide the following services:

Defining Objectives
SIRVA works closely with your Company’s management team to define the overall objectives of the move and ensure their implementation during the move process. As a part of our consultation, we will discuss the Company’s business and human resources goals and objectives, policy issues, the group move timeline, and factors to consider in the cost analysis and process development.

Relocation Cost Analysis
We provide expertise in analyzing the total cost of a group move by detailing the cost impact of policy decisions and local market conditions on both the Company and the employee.

Policy Design
SIRVA can incorporate your business objectives into an appropriate group move policy. A key component of policy design is the solicitation, review and analysis of your employees’ input via the employee survey that we will design to meet the needs of your employee population and the constraints your management has placed on the process. This information, along with policy and benefit guidelines, will result in a Group Move Policy Handbook detailing the corporate relocation program for your employees.

Employee Presentations
We have the depth of experience to assist the Company in securing the employee’s enthusiastic commitment to the move through a carefully planned and professionally presented program for the entire family. This program includes a complete overview of the new destination city and state, plus the ability for employees to ask questions and address concerns about the move. In short, we bring the experts in each resource area to the transferee.

Relocation Resource Center
SIRVA can prepare an on-site, on-going “Relocation Resource Center” for employees and their families, which provides information about the destination city’s schools, housing options, medical facilities, etc.

Information Kit
Each employee will receive a complete package of information about the destination city including, if appropriate, a video about the city. Employees will be assigned a personal relocation counselor who is available to answer questions, research any specific needs they or their family members may have, and arrange for individual home finding trips to the new city (if included in the plan).

Area Tours
SIRVA can organize area tours guaranteed to satisfy your employees’ questions about their new city.

Other services include:
• Home Marketing Assistance
• Home Purchase Assistance
• Home Finding Assistance
• Temporary Housing Assistance
• Spouse Job-Finding Assistance
• Employee Expense Tracking Administration and Tax Calculation Capabilities
• Mortgage Assistance
• Vendor Selection and Management
• Training Material and Programs