What is a group move?
The definition of a group move is when 10 or more employees are being transferred from the same area and to the same area, at the same time, for the same business reason. Group moves are critical to the performance of the company and are of high strategic value in meeting the objectives of the business plan. If the group move is being driven by either a merger or an acquisition, the pressures only become greater as the already charged environment that a group move can create is compounded with the added factors of merging two different cultures. This reality, combined with the inherent risks that a merger or acquisition almost always adds, results in higher stakes and more pressure on corporate relocation program managers to make sure that the right group move process be in place.

Why do group moves fail?
In a series of internal reviews with subject matter experts who have had extensive experience in assisting our clients in planning and managing a wide range of corporate group moves, a number of reasons repeatedly rose to the top as to why a group move may fail:

• Announcing the move without adequate preparation or involvement
• Not having clearly defined objectives
• Lack of time and/or poor planning
• Losing control of the relocating transferees
• Not understanding the unique needs and dynamics of the group
• Not bringing outside resources in early enough
• Political pressure to use non-qualified suppliers
• Lack of senior management endorsement and involvement

How do you avoid the pitfalls? This topic will be covered in our next post. For more information about this subject or to view the complete white paper, visit our resource library.

Let’s set the scene, Mr. Smith a transferee with XYZ Corporation finally sells his house after 180 days on the market. His net proceeds from the sale of his home, after paying off the mortgage, is $2,000—in essence, break-even.

With the credit crunch tightening product guidelines, the down payment requirements have made a significant impact on qualifying for a loan. The no and zero down payment products have been eliminated; consumers that previously qualified for 5% down now qualify for 10% down.

Mr. Smith has a small amount of savings he could use for a down payment, not nearly the 10% down he was approved for at the beginning of his relocation.

As credit tightening continued, products like second mortgages and Home Equity Lines of Credit have been significantly reduced and in many cases eliminated from purchase transactions. These products would typically assist the buyer by providing combination loans (e.g. 80/10/10) piggybacked with a first lien loan as a way to decrease payments, avoid mortgage insurance and provide a lower Loan to Value on the first loan.

Private Mortgage Insurance is still a viable way to provide a less than 20% down payment loan, but mortgage insurance guidelines have also changed and now require higher credit scores and higher premiums. With the combination of falling home sale values decreasing the amount of money available for a down payment, higher down payment requirements, time constraints and more costly mortgage insurance—many transferees are left confused, frustrated and experiencing less satisfaction during the relocation.

Mr. Smith’s situation has a happy ending. He qualified for a 3% down payment with a FHA loan. The monthly payment and down payment requirements fit his budget and he was able to close on his new home on time.

His co-worker Mr. Jones completed a short sale on his home sale and faces other challenges we will discuss next time.

If you would like more information about FHA loans, you can call one of our loan counselors at 800.531.3837.

It's important to define key roles and responsibilities when creating a relocation policy. That is why we've outlined some key points that should be kept in mind.

Internal and external resources
Identifying internal resources early in the relocation process will enable the transferee to assimilate into the new organization quicker, he/she will feel more comfortable, and will also feel more in control of the move.

Setting transferee expectations
Clearly lay out the company's expectations for the transferee during the relocation. This will help prevent the transferee from straying outside the policy.

Supplier network capabilities
Define the role and responsibilities of your company's supplier network, as it is important to be clear about what the supplier can and cannot do on behalf of the transferee.

Key contact list
Include key contact data about each resource that will assist the transferee. This works best if its is organized in the order in which the event will occur in the relocation process. That way the transferee has a frame of reference as to when contact should be made. Naturally, relocation programs work best if there is a clear primary contact that can orchestrate the  required tasks.

For more information about this, visit our resource library.

Over the past few years, a trend has developed with regards to the localization of expatriates. An increasing number of organizations are either adding localization as a new element to their global mobility program or expanding on existing policy and practices—the main driver of this trend is cost containment.

As a refresher—localization is the process when an employee is moved off of the expatriate package and integrated into the host country on local terms of employment.

What Triggers Localization
Localization is usually triggered by a pre-defined limit to assignment length, most commonly three to five years. It is best to proactively address this threshold either in a global assignment policy and/or in the expatriate’s letter of assignment. By communicating a location policy early on in the assignment process, an organization can reduce unplanned or ad-hoc localizations, reduce expatriate demands and negotiations, and reduce the overall “shock” factor to employees.

What Approach to Take
There are a few different approaches to recognize when managing localizations. The first and most common approach is a straight localization, which entails immediately eliminating all expatriate benefits, e.g. housing, COLA, home leave, etc., on the effective date of localization. To execute a straight localization, it is important that the organization has a clearly defined localization process, and re-communicates the process and policy to the expatriate as early as possible. Not surprisingly, moving from a full benefit package to no additional assistance can cause great strain on the employee, especially if they have family accompanying them on the assignment.

The second approach is to phase out the expatriate package over a pre-determined length of time. The transition over to a “local” package can take anywhere from six months to two years. For example, many companies continue to pay a reduced housing allowance for six to twelve months after the effective date of localization. Other provisions that tend to be phased out in exceptional cases include education assistance and home leave.

Another approach is the lump sum approach. This involves the expatriate immediately transferring to local employment. A lump sum payment, however, is offered to the employee to alleviate some of the financial strain of localization. The lump sum can be used to cover education costs of children, assist with home finding and purchase, or to ship household goods from the home country. A lump sum approach is ideal for organizations that like to remain flexible and give their employees the freedom to decide how they want to utilize the localization assistance.

When localizing an expatriate, there are several compensation items that need to be considered. Here is a checklist to use a guideline:

1. Base salary. Should the employee be "re-priced" to the local market pay structure? Should a premium be offered for international experience? Many organizations move the employee to local salary levels. If there is an extreme difference in salary levels (either lower or higher), however, a phased-in approach is often carried out. On the other hand, oftentimes organizations justify paying an expatriate on a higher pay structure because of his/her international experience and business relationships with the home office.

2. Retirement benefits. Because retirement plans, social security and pensions do not cross national boundaries, this is often the most difficult item to transition. Often employees have expectations to remain on their home country retirement program, but unfortunately there is no typical solution to bridge the gap between country plans. Some basic alternatives include retaining the employee in a tax-qualified home country plan, simply transferring to the local plan or using an umbrella-funded plan.

3. Income taxes. Normally, the expatriate will simply transfer to the local tax system. This is not a problem for most of the world. American workers, however, are put in a difficult situation because they are taxed on a worldwide basis. Many organizations will continue the "tax equalization" process on an as-needed basis to prevent double taxation on American expatriates. Employees of other nationalities do not require such assistance.

4. Housing. It is recommended that organizations remain flexible regarding host country housing because many factors come into play when deciding how to handle housing for the expatriate. In many locations throughout the world, expatriate housing is vastly different than local standards and expectations. In some cases, it may be unreasonable to expect an expatriate to move into a local neighborhood or local style housing, e.g. Mumbai, Beijing, Jakarta, etc. Therefore, if the expatriate is moved to the local salary structure, a housing allowance may be needed to subsidize continued living in expatriate style housing. Other issues that arise with housing tax issues, family matters, property ownership laws, home search assistance and moving costs.

5. G&S differential/assignment incentives. In locations where assignees receive a G&S differential, the common practice is to immediately stop the allowance. Other options include a phase-out or lump-sum buyout, although it is rare for companies to continue to pay a G&S allowance beyond the effective localization date. Other assignment incentives such as mobility premiums, hardship allowances, etc. are also normally stopped upon conversion to local status.

6. Education for dependent children. After housing, this item is the most commonly subsidized cost after an expatriate is localized, especially if the local schools are inadequate based on international standards or if the host country language is an issue. To alleviate the problem, organizations should consider continuing education coverage, or pay a percentage of the education costs for one to two years.

7. Health care. Health care standards and costs vary greatly in different parts of the world and is a priority issue for most employees and their families. Normally, localizing employees will simply transfer into the local health care system, but concerns will arise if the health coverage in the new location is of a lower standard than in the home location. This will be a costly change for an employee coming into the United States, where typically the health care is more expensive. Because of their time spent in the host country, a localized employee will most likely be aware of the issues, and therefore be in a position to make appropriate decisions.

Finally, localization may subject the employee and the company to various employment laws and regulations that apply to employees hired by local companies. It is important to speak with a local employment counsel to understand the legal effects and ramifications of localization, including subjecting the company to stringent employment laws in some European countries.
Localizing expatriates can be a complicated process and is not as simple as transferring expatriates to a local compensation package. By having a strategic plan in place, companies can anticipate potential localization issues and make the process as efficient as possible.

The decision to relocate an employee or new hire is the result of a great deal of effort and evaluation by a company and then by the prospective transferee. Agreeing to relocate at the request of an organization is not always an easy decision for an individual and his/her family to make. When describing your company’s corporate relocation policy it is important to remember that no matter what the circumstances are, agreeing to relocate will begin a stressful and sometimes life-changing process for most transferees. When crafting the relocation policy it is advisable to look beyond just describing the level of benefits that will be provided. You should also consider if the policy will assist and support the transferee when it is examined at the start of the relocation.

When writing a relocation policy there is a checklist of things to keep in mind when setting the right tone:

Optimistic Empathy
Start your company’s relocation policy with a supportive and positive welcome or introduction. Recognize what your company is asking transferees to do and acknowledge what they may face during the relocation process. Let the transferee know that your company understands the experiences of other transferees that have preceded them. Point out that understanding and following the relocation policy will minimize the disruption to the lives of the employee and their families. Close the introduction with words of appreciation and thanks for accepting the relocation.

Rational Processes and Requirements
When describing a process or requirement in your company’s policy, include the reasons behind the wording. Letting the transferee know the “why” can often increase voluntary policy compliance and reduce the level of enforcement needed. While relocation is a complex process and there are a number of hard rules that need to be followed, the tone of the policy as being one of mutual benefit is critical. The key is to avoid setting a negative and controlling tone that may offend the reader and create a pessimistic view of the relocation process and even perhaps of your organization.

Clarity and Firmness
A policy needs to be both clear in what it says and firm in how it says it. A policy should not give the impression that the components are subject to personal interpretation and/or can be negotiated. Some policies even state up front that the company is ”…please to provided you with a quality relocation program and exceptions are not anticipated.” While the tone needs to be supportive, the policy must still clearly state what benefits will or will not be provided. If the company style/format guidelines permit, write the corporate relocation policy in the second person voice. Using the pronouns “you” and “your” adds a personal tone to the policy. It also assists the employee in understanding what processes and procedures he or she must follow.

There is no such thing as a small relocation, but some companies don't require the large-scale support needed by those relocating hundreds or even thousands of employees annually. For these companies, SIRVA Advantage might be the answer. SIRVA Advantage is a program developed specifically for companies that relocate fewer than 30 employees per year. Currently, 120 companies participate in the program.

Through the program, companies have access to a dedicated service delivery team with specialized experience in small-volume relocations. Users don't have to be experts in relocation because all the details are handled for them. SIRVA can get a relocation program up and running quickly, and because they manage every aspect of the program, companies don't have to worry about the details. Transferees receive the full benefits of having a corporate relocation provider manage their transfer without the large corporate relocation budget.

"Companies that relocate a small number of employees have different needs than those of their large-volume counterparts," said Tim Callahan, senior vice president of sales and marketing SIRVA, Inc. "These companies may not be as familiar with the process or the complexities involved in different domestic or international relocation scenarios because they simply don't relocate employees as often."

Using SIRVA Advantage, companies can choose their services á la carte, which offers them the flexibility to develop a cost-effective custom program to fit their needs. SIRVA Advantage provides companies with guidance and assistance on a range of relocation issues, including:

• Domestic and international support
• Fixed-fee or traditional home sale programs
• Home marketing services
• Home finding and new home purchase services
• Home rental and temporary housing services
• Mortgage services
• Move management
• Tax and legal services
• Vendor contracts
• Online relocation tracking and reporting

One-on-one attention and interactive tools
The Advantage process starts with a consultation between our client and SIRVA Advantage's Business Development Manager, Jane Yanosko, to coordinate services tailored for each transferee - with this program a corporate relocation policy is not needed, SIRVA's abbreviated contract serves as the purchase order for all services authorized by the client. Once services are determined and the transfer process is initiated, the client and the transferee receive dedicated support from relocation counselors and associates focused on serving clients with fewer than 30 relocations annually.

In addition, transferees have access to MoveOurHome.com, a Web portal designed to help them take an active part in their move. MoveOurHome.com has up-to-the-minute relocation information configured on a per-client basis. On the site, transferees can view company-specific policy information and transferee-specific relocation program information.

"Transferees can submit, view and check the status of expense reports, communicate with their relocation counselor, and specify home and area preferences," continues Callahan. "They also have access to an online move organizer and essential destination information such as weather, crime statistics, school reports, population figures and other community information."* SIRVA Advantage was developed based on input from current customers and internal service teams, and is designed to provide a company will a small or no relocation program a high level of service on a more flexible, on-demand basis.

To learn more about SIRVA Advantage, contact Jane Yanosko, SIRVA Advantage business development manager, at 800.531.3840 or jane.yanosko@sirva.com.

The complex and rapidly changing socioeconomic and political climate in China, together with a massive shortage of skilled workers, makes human capital and global workforce development particularly challenging. As a follow-up to SIRVA's China Urban Index, released in 2006, SIRVA Relocation recently completed a study to address the lack of readily available relocation data and trending on mobility policy and practices in China. The results are documented in "The SIRVA China Mobility Report."

Thirty-seven leading global companies contributed to this unique SIRVA research initiative, the results of which have formed a valuable benchmark framework for human resources professionals to observe current key mobility policy and practices in China. This benchmark report on key findings and trends represents SIRVA Relocation's analysis of the most up-to-date data spanning seven industry sectors in both Tier 1 and Non-Tier 1 regions in China. 

Substantial differences in infrastructure and accessibility exist between Tier 1 and Non-Tier 1 regions, which companies must evaluate when creating policies to introduce employees to these varied conditions. 

Below is a check-list of key findings for this study.

Key Findings
Current Assignments: While all participating companies reported traditional international short- and long-term assignments, there is an emerging trend of new assignment types. Twenty-eight percent of companies have domestic short- and long-term and permanent one-way assignments and 33 percent of companies report permanent one-way moves into Tier 1 and Non-Tier 1 locations.

Emerging Trends and Associated Challenges: As companies in China look to expand their business with locally or regionally hired resources, rather than high-cost, international long-term assignments, it is anticipated that future permanent one-way assignments will increase more than any other assignment type. Companies have found permanent one-way assignments to be the most challenging, contradictory and controversial, making it difficult to establish a framework for policies and practices.

As a result, assignment terms and conditions are handled on a case-by-case basis due to lack of benchmarking data and experience among human resources professionals and global mobility managers. Consequently, inequalities are widening in remuneration packages as talent becomes more valuable, so new models will have to be developed to mirror evolution in emerging assignment types.

Domestic relocations are new to China. Like regionally hired permanent one-way moves, they are predicted to increase. These moves, which originate and conclude in China, are used predominantly in Non-Tier 1 cities where there is significant growth.

Cross-cultural Awareness: Most companies provide cross-cultural awareness programs to transferees: however, few companies currently enforce mandatory sessions. SIRVA expects more companies will emphasize cross-cultural training to ease the transition into Chinese culture and create an understanding of language and customs.

Assignment Administration Outsourcing: 70 percent of companies surveyed outsource assignee administration and between 86 and 92 percent outsource various assignee support services. However, companies outsource contract preparation and international compensation. SIRVA is witnessing an increased trend in companies consulting with external providers for mobility policy development due to a lack of available resources and global mobility expertise in-house.

Assignment Representation across Industries: The following graph provides a snapshot of industries and assignment types in Tier 1 and Non-Tier 1 locations. Click here to view the graph.

Of the surveyed companies, IT/telecom and petrochemical industries show the highest representations of assignee population in Tier 1, followed by manufacturing and pharmaceutical.  IT/telecom and petro-chemical industries also show the highest representations in Non-Tier 1 regions, followed by manufacturing and automotive.

The study also indicates the majority of assignments in Tier 1 and Non-Tier 1 regions are long-term and short-term assignments, followed by permanent one-way moves. 

For more information you can visit http://chinaindex.sirva.com/study.asp

There are several types of training courses available for foreign nationals relocating internationally to the United States. From cultural awareness training to language training, companies can employ several tactics to help foreign nationals better acclimate to life and business in a new country.

Language training may be the most obvious form of support for foreign nationals in the United States. This may be the case for those transferees who speak little or no English, but many companies overlook those transferees who relocate from countries where English is a first or second language.

Some companies may assume that when a transferee relocates to the United States from an English speaking country such as India or Singapore, they have a command of the English language and need little assistance, but what many companies are beginning to realize is that a foreign national who is completely fluent in the English language may still be routinely misunderstood because of their accent.

Benefits of Accent Reduction Training
Companies internationally relocate foreign nationals to the United States at great expense. They are often experts in their field and are brought to this country because of their technical expertise, qualifications and experience.

Much of this value can be lost if they are unable to communicate effectively with their office colleagues, teams or clients. Not only does this impact a transferee’s effectiveness, but it can also lead to frustration and feelings of isolation.

By making accent reduction programs available to foreign nationals, organizations can maximize their expertise and knowledge. It can help ensure a positive return on the company’s investment in the transferee and further the individual’s career development during and after the international relocation assignment.

More information about this topic coming this week.

A recording of The Fundamentals of Relocation Webinar session is now available. This session will provide a brief history of the industry, and a broad overview of the relocation process, including a review of the terms and concepts most common to relocation policy development and implementation. The discussion will include household goods and temporary living options, the home sale process based on IRS Revenue Rulings, and industry trends such as lump-sum benefits and high-cost area assistance.

 View the Webinar

A recording of The Fundamentals of Relocation Webinar session is now available. This session will provide a brief history of the industry, and a broad overview of the relocation process, including a review of the terms and concepts most common to relocation policy development and implementation. The discussion will include household goods and temporary living options, the home sale process based on IRS Revenue Rulings, and industry trends such as lump-sum benefits and high-cost area assistance.

 View the Webinar

A recording of The Fundamentals of Relocation Webinar session is now available. This session will provide a brief history of the industry, and a broad overview of the relocation process, including a review of the terms and concepts most common to relocation policy development and implementation. The discussion will include household goods and temporary living options, the home sale process based on IRS Revenue Rulings, and industry trends such as lump-sum benefits and high-cost area assistance.

 View the Webinar

A recording of The Fundamentals of Relocation Webinar session is now available. This session will provide a brief history of the industry, and a broad overview of the relocation process, including a review of the terms and concepts most common to relocation policy development and implementation. The discussion will include household goods and temporary living options, the home sale process based on IRS Revenue Rulings, and industry trends such as lump-sum benefits and high-cost area assistance.

 View the Webinar

• Tie benefits to desired behavior: Companies have every right to require transferees to follow established home sale processes. The process to be followed should be clearly stated in the company's corporate relocation policy along with the benefits to the transferee.  Reasonable expectations include complying with the company code of conduct and following the corporate relocation service providers' recommendations which are based on the company's policy. Penalties for not complying with the terms of the policy, as well as any home sale incentives that are to be offered, should also be clearly outlined.

• Require full property disclosure and educate transferees on ineligible properties: Accurate assessments of property history, condition and initial ownership risk when a home is sold limits future risk potential and protects both the company and transferees. Transferees should understand that purchasing ineligible properties may cancel future home sale benefits.

• Require active transferee marketing participation:  Home marketing needs to be well planned, supported and implemented properly by all parties involved. Because the real estate market is changing rapidly, marketing strategies must be adjusted quickly, and prices need to be reduced in shorter intervals. Failure to adequately react can extend marketing time, increase corporate relocation program costs, push homes into inventory, decrease the pool of potential buyers, and reduce the final price transferees receive on the home sale.

• Evaluate all offers: Every appraisal should be thoroughly reviewed before giving it to the transferee in order to ensure they properly recognize the current market conditions. Do not hesitate to negotiate down to 95 percent of the appraised value. This also minimizes the emotional reaction to perceived "low" offers and the potential loss of an offer that would have been acceptable to the company.

• Require mandatory home-finding assistance:  Home-finding assistance reduces home loss-on-sale risk for those transferees (such as new hires) who are future relocation candidates and ensures employees don't purchase ineligible properties. It also helps mitigate the challenges of current market conditions, such as selecting a qualified agent, planning home-finding trips, evaluating financing options and reviewing contracts.

• Develop home sales programs that fit your company's risk profile:  Home sale programs vary in risk based on several factors. These include program type, number of controls in place, current market conditions, locations where homes are sold or purchased, past company practices and company culture. It is critical that companies are aware of the risks involved and create a home sale program that meets the company's overall service, cost and risk objectives.

For assistance incorporating these real estate best practices into your corporate relocation program or to learn more about how to mitigate real estate risks via a home sale program, visit David Barlow's blog.

According to the latest forecast by the National Association of Realtors® (NAR), over the next few months, existing home sales in the United States are expected to hold fairly steady, then rise later in the year and continue to improve in 2009. NAR reports existing home sales for 2007 totaled 5.65 million, but projects home sales to edge up to 5.70 million this year and reach 5.91 million in 2009, which is still well below the 6.48 million units sold in 2006.

New construction home sales will continue to decline. According to the Association, new-home sales were reported at 770,000 for 2007, and are projected to decline to 669,000 this year before rising to 730,000 in 2009, but well below the 1.05 million in 2006.

In an early January speech, Daniel H. Mudd, chief executive of the mortgage finance company Fannie Mae, said home prices would "perhaps begin to gain modestly" in 2010. However, The National Association of Realtors (NAR) has a more positive prognostication that by the end of 2008 or early in 2009 most markets will start seeing appreciation once again.      

SIRVA does suggest companies put the appropriate controls in place to reduce risk and manage program performance at both the departure and destination locations. The following 12 best practices will help companies provide the policy framework so that transferees price and market their homes so they have a greater probability of selling their homes to an outside buyer and not have them go into inventory.

• Use qualified agents:  Use a network of qualified brokers, such as those found in SIRVA's Preferred Broker Network, to ensure transferees receive the right expertise and the best value when selling their home in the current real estate market. Using a qualified and "relocation experienced" broker is critical because if a home is listed at an incorrect price or without adequate marketing support, it is unlikely to find a timely buyer at the optimal sales price.

• Require two broker price options/broker market analyses: Multiple broker price options will help establish the most accurate selling price, which is key to quickly selling a home. Because market activity steadily falls after the first few weeks a home is on the market, pricing realistically from the beginning will attract more potential buyers.

• Delay appraisals: Delay appraisals to provide the opportunity to market a home before incurring appraisal costs. This provides more data for appraisers to use in value determination, sets more realistic value expectations, and lowers home sale cost and risk.

• Support mandatory marketing periods: Require transferees to list their homes and market them effectively for a mandatory period of time (at least 60 days) in order to increase, not only the number of amended-value sales, but also the opportunities to generate outside sales with no appraisals needed.

• Establish list-price caps:  Establish list-price caps to prevent over-listing during the property's initial exposure to the market, which is one of the most common reasons a home sits on the market. Make sure that your company's policy language specifically states that a home may not be listed at more than 105% of the average of the two most-probable sales prices from the broker market analyses. More and more companies are now going to 104% or even 103%. The list price should also be adjusted based on changes in market conditions and/or receipt of the appraised value offer.

• Modify a BVO/BVX to AVO/AVX:  In down real estate markets, some homes simply will not sell-even when transferees do everything right. Offer a guaranteed buyout after 90, 120 or 150 days to ensure the home will not be on the market past a certain time frame. This will eliminate delays in a transferee's relocation schedule, diminish transferee frustration from not selling his or her home or even prevent a cancelled relocation.

The other six best practices will be posted later today, so stay tuned. 

There are several key decisions and considerations to weigh when considering whether to implement a loss-on-sale assistance program or revise an existing program. These include eligibility, rules and requirements, minimum transferee loss or deductible, maximum benefit caps, capital improvements and tax assistance.

According to Barlow, eligibility could be extended to any of the following combinations of groups: all homeowners regardless of salary tier; only homeowners in the highest salary bracket(s); and/or homeowners who purchased within a certain number of years before their transfer.

“Companies might also want to consider whether new construction should be penalized since they generally depreciate quicker in a declining market than existing homes,” he added.

One critical requirement should be that, whenever transferees purchase and sell their homes, they must follow all of the rules required in their company’s
relocation policy. “This includes whether or not the transferee bears a minimum loss of some sort, incurs a deductible to offset the loss-on-sale, or shares the loss with the company,” explained Barlow.

Barlow also recommended all companies have maximum benefit caps, which may be determined by such factors as geographical area (i.e. California vs. Illinois) and whether or not the amount is tax assisted. Generally caps range from $10,000 to $100,000, with $25,000, $50,000 and $75,000 being most common.

However, at the end of the day, the amount of the program is going to be what the company can afford and this varies not only by company but also by industry.

fundamentals of relocation webinar
Thursday, May 22, 2008
1:00 p.m. EST (10:00 a.m. PT)

Speaker: David Barlow, SCRP, GMS, Senior Vice President, Client Support Services, SIRVA
Duration: One hour

This "relocation 101" webinar is designed for new relocation professionals, procurement managers and supply chain managers who would like an overview of relocation fundamentals, and for anyone who wants to stay current with the latest policy trends and best practices.

This session will provide a brief history of the industry, and a broad overview of the relocation process, including a review of the terms and concepts most common to relocation policy development and implementation. The discussion will include household goods and temporary living options, the home sale process based on IRS Revenue Rulings, and industry trends such as lump-sum benefits and high-cost area assistance.

Register at https://van.webex.com/van/j.php?ED=91994767&RG=1

Details for joining the session will be included in the registration confirmation e-mail

fundamentals of relocation webinar
Thursday, May 22, 2008
1:00 p.m. EST (10:00 a.m. PT)

Speaker: David Barlow, SCRP, GMS, Senior Vice President, Client Support Services, SIRVA
Duration: One hour

This "relocation 101" webinar is designed for new relocation professionals, procurement managers and supply chain managers who would like an overview of relocation fundamentals, and for anyone who wants to stay current with the latest policy trends and best practices.

This session will provide a brief history of the industry, and a broad overview of the relocation process, including a review of the terms and concepts most common to relocation policy development and implementation. The discussion will include household goods and temporary living options, the home sale process based on IRS Revenue Rulings, and industry trends such as lump-sum benefits and high-cost area assistance.

Register at https://van.webex.com/van/j.php?ED=91994767&RG=1

Details for joining the session will be included in the registration confirmation e-mail

According to the National Association of REALTORS® (NAR), 2007 home sales were down 12.7 percent from 2006. And, excluding new construction, home prices in 2007 slipped 0.7 percent from 2006—marking the first nationwide decline since the Great Depression.

The sub-prime disaster led financial institutions to more closely evaluate borrowers, and as a result, those individuals that could previously secure a mortgage may not be eligible today. This drop in qualified buyers has meant an increase in housing inventories and the number of days homes are on the market across the country.

While the current real estate market means greater selection and reasonable prices for fewer qualified buyers, it’s especially tough on sellers. Loss-on-sale (LOS) assistance programs are typically used to partially protect home sellers from taking a loss on their home when relocating for business. LOS programs are typically employed when home market values depreciate at a faster pace than would be covered from having lived in the home long enough to break-even.

At SIRVA University, David Barlow, SCRP GMS, senior vice president of client support services at SIRVA Relocation, discussed best practices when developing
or revising a corporate relocation LOS assistance program. He discussed program management definitions, sample formulas, up-to-date facts, and eligibility requirements. He also discussed common pitfalls and how they can be avoided.

According to the NAR, the worst may be over but the national market is not yet in a positive price territory. While there is every indication the market hasn’t yet turned the corner to nationwide home price recovery, experts are confident a correction may begin as early as the end of this year.

“From indicators we’ve seen, downward price pressure in many markets will continue, but likely at a reduced rate of decline,” said Barlow. “The number of home sale losses is likely to stay relatively high but shouldn’t increase from 2007. It will get better, but the market won’t reverse itself overnight.”

Don’t Call it a Comeback
Loss-on-sale assistance programs were developed more than 25 years ago to address similar market conditions as what we see today. The need for these programs often diminished as the market strengthened, but they were sometimes employed during very short relocation intervals or with new construction to ensure sellers didn’t take a loss on their homes. In point of fact, in normal real estate times, it was nearly always the new construction that resulted in a LOS.

In poor market conditions, the amount of time between a relocation and the break-even point changes dramatically, and transferees essentially need to stay in their homes much longer to avoid taking a loss on their property.

According to Barlow, potential transferees have every right to want to wait out a bad market to avoid a loss on their home. They also have every right to expect their company to provide greater financial incentives if they are expected to relocate in a down real estate market. In fact, transferees are increasingly resisting and turning down corporate relocations if their companies decide not to help.

Correcting a common misconception, Barlow also noted that home LOS has nothing to do with the transferee’s equity position in their home. If a person has taken out a second mortgage or an equity line of credit the LOS benefit they may receive is often not going to provide the relief they need. Companies are strongly advised to limit LOS programs to the difference between what the transferee paid for the home and the home’s selling price.

% Loss-On-Sale Facts & Figures
95% of homes sold out of inventory result in loss to the company, even in good real estate times
50% of companies offer loss-on-sale assistance benefits
89% of SIRVA client’s share loss with their employees
75% of companies do tax protect the loss-on-sale assistance amount

Is it right for your company? Find out tomorrow as we continue to blog about LOS programs. Interested in learning more about reducing real estate risk? visit David's blog.

fundamentals of relocation webinar
Thursday, May 22, 2008
1:00 p.m. EST (10:00 a.m. PT)

Speaker: David Barlow, SCRP, GMS, Senior Vice President, Client Support Services, SIRVA
Duration: One hour

This "relocation 101" webinar is designed for new relocation professionals, procurement managers and supply chain managers who would like an overview of relocation fundamentals, and for anyone who wants to stay current with the latest policy trends and best practices.

This session will provide a brief history of the industry, and a broad overview of the relocation process, including a review of the terms and concepts most common to relocation policy development and implementation. The discussion will include household goods and temporary living options, the home sale process based on IRS Revenue Rulings, and industry trends such as lump-sum benefits and high-cost area assistance.

Register at https://van.webex.com/van/j.php?ED=91994767&RG=1

Details for joining the session will be included in the registration confirmation e-mail