Relocation Worldwide

Some companies have very sophisticated well-thought-through global mobility programs that have been tried and tested for many years. Others are stepping into the global arena for the first time. Either way it doesn’t hurt to check the health of your global mobility program and consider what I would believe to be the 10 best practices to ensure your global relocation program is a successful one.

10 Best Practices to Ensure a Successful Global Relocation

1. Policy
   1. Make sure you have a formal global policy in place that has been reviewed by your global relocation provider for competitiveness and efficiency and bench-marked against industry standards.Candidate Selection 
2. Candidate Selection
   1. Utilize pre-decision surveys or interviews to ensure that your candidate is flexible, adaptable and ready to take on the challenge of an international assignment.
3. Benchmark
   1. Keep up-to-date as situations change, trends develop, and new products come to market.
4. Cost Estimates
   1. In today’s economic environment it’s prudent to have a cost estimate completed before sending someone on an assignment so you have an idea how much it is going to cost.
5. Cost Analysis
   1. Know what you’re spending and what policy changes or exceptions are costing or saving money. There are many examples of companies focusing on elements that are inexpensive and denying them, while allowing exceptions for other elements that are very expensive.
6. Track Exceptions
   1. Be sure to always track any policy exception that was made or declined and the cost of that exception. This will help you be consistent in how you treat other exception requests in the future.
7. Use Proven Providers
   1. Proven providers can give you good advice on all elements of a global relocation and can make the process easier for you.
8. Don’t Cut Corners to Reduce Costs
   1. There is usually a good reason to do something well.
9. Create a Repatriation and Reintegration Plan Well Before the Assignment Ends!
   1. If you don’t, you may risk losing a valuable employee. Statistics show that up to 70 percent of repatriated assignees leave their employer within two years, usually to join a competitor.

For more information on the above global mobility program components and services, please contact SIRVA Relocation for a consultation.

 

Before you announce that a corporate group move (or relocation) is taking place, it is important to be prepared. A part of that will be identifying the resources you will need. Consider all the internal departments that need to be involved or will be impacted by the move. Evaluate if you need to bring in outside resources to assist you in managing the move.

Too often people underestimate the complexity of a group move and the critical need to have the time to properly prepare for the move prior to it being announced. For those employees who are moving, as well as those employees who are not going to move, you or someone on the team need to have the answers to a number of critical questions such as:

Questions that need to be answered for employees who are moving:

• What organizational units and types of jobs will be involved?
• How many jobs will be moved? From where? To where?
• Has selection criteria been established? Will the criteria be publicized?
• How will transferees be selected and invited? What will be the administrative process for job offer and acceptance?
• Will transferees’ departure-area jobs be re-filled? If so, how?
• How many job openings in the new facility will be filled locally?
• Will there be new-hires to be relocated?
• Will group move relocation benefits expire at a certain point in time?

Questions that need to be answered for employees who are not moving:

• Why wasn’t I asked to move?
• Will I be offered a new job?
• Do I need to apply for it?
• When will my current job end?
• Will there be a stay or retention bonus?
• Is there a severance package?
• If a job opens up at the new location, can I apply for it?
• Can I apply for a job at another location?

In today’s precarious economy, many employers are considering giving relocation loans to employees. Several of these employers may not have provided relocation loans to employees before, but are now looking for ways to increase the opportunity to make such loans available.  .

A relocation loan that is done correctly can be offered to the employee interest-free and without exposure to creating imputed interest to the employee which would be treated by the Internal Revenue Service as compensation income.

The following information concerning below market rate loans is an excerpt from an article published by the Worldwide Employee Relocation Council® (ERC) in its Tax and Legal MasterSource:

A. Types of relocation loans

1. Mortgage loans

A mortgage loan is extended by the employer to the employee with the understanding that the employee will use the proceeds of the loan to purchase a new principal residence. Such loan may be a demand or term loan, and is conditioned on the future performance of substantial services for the employer. The loan may have a market interest rate, a below market interest rate, or no interest at all.

2. Equity bridge loans

A loan may be offered to an employee in order to enable the employee to receive the equity out of an old unsold residence to make the down payment on a new residence. The terms of the loan may require that the proceeds be repaid within a short time after the sale of the former residence. The loan may have a market interest rate, or a below market interest rate, or no interest at all.

B. Imputation of interest on a loan transaction

1. Explanation of imputed interest

When a loan is made at a below market interest rate, or with no interest at all, the Internal Revenue Code may impute interest to the loan even though the lender and borrower never did. If imputed interest rules apply to an employee relocation loan, the amount by which a market rate of interest exceeds the loan’s actual rate of interest is considered income to the employee borrower. (The market rate used is the "applicable federal rate," which is computed by the IRS under a formula in the Internal Revenue Code and periodically adjusted.) This income is considered to be derived from the employer-lender, because the employer-lender is considered to have paid interest on the loan to itself on behalf of the employee-borrower.

2. An example of imputed interest

An example of imputed interest may be helpful in understanding this complex area. Assume that the employer has made an interest-free bridge loan to the employee. The market rate of interest on the loan would be $100 per month if interest were charged by the employer-lender. No interest is paid by the employee-borrower or received by the employer-lender. However, the tax law considers the employee-borrower to have owed $100 of interest, and since the employee’s obligation to pay this $100 was satisfied by the employer-lender, the transaction is treated as though the employer-lender paid $100 per month to the employee-borrower, who then repaid it to the employer-lender. This characterization of the transaction gives rise to $100 per month of compensation income to the employee-borrower.

3. Reporting requirements for imputed interest

The employee-borrower must report imputed income on his/her tax return, even though the employee never received it, but then may be entitled to a corresponding deduction for the interest theoretically paid on the employee’s behalf by the employer-lender.

4. Negative tax consequences of imputed interest

If interest is imputed to loans it has negative tax consequences for the employer-lender and may have for the employee-borrower. The employer-lender must pay payroll taxes (FICA, RRTA, and FUTA) on the amounts imputed as interest income to the employee-borrower. (The employer-lender, however, does not have to withhold federal income taxes on the imputed interest income.) The employee-borrower may or may not be eligible for a deduction of the imputed interest. The interest on a mortgage or bridge loan may be deductible as "qualified residence interest" under the general rules applicable to homeowners. However, there may be situations in which interest income is imputed to the employee, but the employee is unable to take a corresponding interest deduction. For example, there is a $100,000 limit on the amount of home equity debt upon which interest is deductible.

C. Avoidance of imputed interest

1. De minimis exception

If the total principal amount of the employer’s mortgage loan, bridge loan, or both outstanding to the employee does not exceed $10,000 during the year, the loans are ex-empted from the imputed interest rules due to their small size. No interest will be imputed in this situation.

2. Exemption for employee relocation loans under regulation 1.7872-5T

Under a temporary regulation, imputed interest will not apply to compensation-related mortgage or bridge loans if the following requirements are met:

      a. Exemption for mortgage loans

          The loan agreement must require the following provisions:

i. The proceeds of the loan must be used only to purchase the new residence.

ii. Such loans must be secured by a mortgage on the new principal residence acquired in connection with the relocation of the employee to a new principal place of work.

iii. The loan must be a demand or term loan.

iv. The benefits of the interest arrangements must not be transferable.

v. The below market interest rate (or the lack of interest) must be conditioned on the future performance of substantial services by the employee.

vi. The employee must certify to the employer that the employee reasonably expects to itemize deductions for each year the loan is outstanding.

     b. Exemption for bridge loans

The terms of the bridge loan must meet all the requirements for the mortgage loan as stated above except for the security requirement. Note, however, that any interest actually charged on a bridge loan will not be deductible by the transferee unless the loan is secured by either the old or new residence. In addition, the bridge loan agreement must provide that the loan is payable in full within 15 days after the sale of the employee’s immediately former principal residence. The aggregate of the principal amount of all outstanding bridge loans must not be greater than the employer’s reasonable estimate of the equity in the former residence. The former residence must not be converted to business or investment use.

     c. An unresolved issue

One issue that remains unresolved under the temporary regulation is whether the exemption applies in situations where imputed interest would not be deductible under the general rules applicable to home mortgage loan interest deductions. This problem is particularly acute for bridge loans, which are often unsecured by either the old or new residence, and, even if secured by the old residence may be considered home equity loans, and therefore limited to $100,000 of principal on which interest would be deductible. Although the IRS has not spoken to this issue, it is arguable that the 1986 Tax Reform Act, which imposed the current limitations on deductibility of interest, would be held to modify the exemption contained in the temporary regulation. However, in the absence of any IRS statement of position, it should be assumed that the regulation may still be relied upon. The IRS continues to follow the regulation, and has shown no interest in revisiting it.

We all know that real estate is local. However-in our current real estate situation-we are seeing more markets continue to see a slip in home sales with only a few who are reporting an increase. The National Association of Realtors (NAR) reports areas such as Colorado Springs, Colo., Sacramento, Calif. and Spartanburg, S.C. are experiencing double-digit pending sales gains compared to a year ago with a significant percentage of these sales attributed to investors who are buying foreclosed properties. So while some markets have seen tremendous growth in home sales compared to last year, others have seen contract signings slashed by as much as 50 percent.

The current real estate market for the typical residential home is still very much a buyer's market. Attractive interest rates, large inventories of homes for sale and lower-than-average sale prices make it a great time to buy. Sellers aren't so fortunate. In fact, some areas have seen home values drop so low that typically willing transferees are hesitant to take a corporate relocation because of loss-on-sale concerns or owing more on their properties than the current market value sales price.

According to a recent survey conducted by the Worldwide ERC®, the number one reason employees are reluctant to relocate is a direct effect of the troubled real estate market. The survey indicated that more than 95 percent of respondents reported "slowed real estate appreciation at the old location," as the reason their employees are averse to moving. This is a stark contrast from last year when only 16 percent cited the real estate market as the reason for their reluctance. Instead, high housing costs, high cost-of-living and family resistance to move, were top concerns.

"Today, it's an unfortunate fact that those true soldiers that have faithfully relocated every two to three years are cooling to the idea because of the economy and the fear that they will take a considerable home loss-on-sale," says David Barlow, SIRVA's senior consultant. 

Barlow advises companies that have not done so to consider implementing a loss-on-sale policy to remain competitive and to help their transferees with the reality of falling home values and sale prices. He also advises companies that already have a loss-on-sale policy to re-evaluate the loss-on-sale limit or cap to ensure it is sufficient in today's difficult real estate market.

It's no secret that the current real estate market has had a significant impact on the relocation industry. Companies have had to reevaluate and update their corporate relocation policies to overcome the challenges of the current market.

Barlow doesn't wager a guess on when the market will turn, but he expects companies will be working through the challenges of the current real estate market for some time to come.
 

In case you haven’t noticed there have been some significant exchange rate movements in the past few months due to the global financial crisis that is churning. International HR professionals are well aware of this and so are expatriates whose compensation packages appear to be impacted by such movements.

For example, the U.S. dollar has declined significantly since late 2006; it then rebounded abruptly in the Fall of 2008. Five currencies have experienced noticeable changes in the last two months, the Australian Dollar (AUD), the Brazilian Real (BRL), the Canadian Dollar (CAD), the British Pound (GBP) and the South-Korean Won (KRW).

So what should companies do about this? First, they should use specialist third party organizations such as ORC and Air Inc. to provide advice on cost-of-living data and other related information to help provide accurate solutions. These companies use complex formulas to track cost-of-living and related exchange rates to minimize the negative financial impact that currency fluctuations can have on expatriates living under one currency but being remunerated in another currency. 

Such currency volatility is not unprecedented, and urgent action is not normally required as long as allowances and payments are reviewed frequently; for example moving to a quarterly review may be worth considering. Only where inflation is running out of control should exchange rates be considered more frequently (e.g. Zimbabwe), but in these extreme cases, a local currency should be avoided if possible.

Below are some solutions that should be considered:

• Quarterly reviews of allowances and payments made in an affected currency
• Consider a split pay approach that would deliver a combined goods and services amount normally spent at home, plus a goods and services differential in the host currency
• Communicate with expatriates, to show how their purchasing power is being protected

For assistance in reviewing your company’s global mobility policies and process related to expatriate compensation, please contact SIRVA.

Lynn Bragg, Worldwide ERC® CEO, has agreed to speak at this year's SIRVA University, which will be held on April 1 - 4, 2009 at The Ritz-Carlton in Palm Beach, Florida.

Lynn will be presenting a 2009 relocation industry outlook address, which is sure to be an informative session for the relocation professionals who attend this year's event.

Lynn's Full Bio
Video of Lynn Speaking at ERC's Global Workforce Symposium

More information about this anticipated event to follow.

While globalization has opened many opportunities for business, it has created some significant challenges. One leading challenge for global managers is learning to understand and appreciate cultural values, practices, and various nuances in different parts of the world. Experts in international business agree that to succeed in global business, managers should be open to others’ ideas and opinions and have the flexibility to respond positively and effectively to practices and values that are oftentimes drastically different from what they are accustomed to. Cultural training has been shown to improve an individual’s relationships with host nationals and allows expatriates to adjust more rapidly to a new culture and an international relocation.

There are a variety of training techniques that prepare people for foreign work assignments. They range from documentary programs that merely expose people to a new culture through materials about the country’s sociopolitical history, geography, economics, language and cultural institutions, to intense interpersonal-experience training, in which individuals participate in role-playing exercises, simulated social settings and similar experiences in order to “feel” the differences in new culture. Successful cross-cultural programs can include the following:

Local business etiquette. Even the most veteran and prolific employee can have difficulty without an understanding of business etiquette in other cultures. For example, the U.S. tendency to “get down to business” is regarded as rude in Japan, where business transactions often have a greater personal relationship component. An employee who appears impatient with Japanese traditions designed to establish friendship and trust will have little success in business negotiations.

Cultural biases. International relocation assignees should always examine the way their own culture affects their perceptions of right and wrong, good and bad manners, values, dress, and other customs. Cultural training can improve understanding of the cultural forces that affect their own behaviors and help assignees learn how to adapt to new cultural demands and the international relocation.

Customized training. Additional training can include special modules to help the employee and his or her family with their own individual concerns. For example, if the assignee’s children will be attending local schools, modules and resources on education etiquette would be appropriate.

To learn more, please visit our resource library

Before you announce that a corporate group move (or relocation) is taking place, it is important to be prepared. A part of that will be identifying the resources you will need. Consider all the internal departments that need to be involved or will be impacted by the move. Evaluate if you need to bring in outside resources to assist you in managing the move. It may not always be obvious who should be on the team.

It may be that there is a “working team” and a “guidance review team.” Having a “team within a team” is an efficient way of keeping people focused and available, rather than in meetings.

Once your team or teams are selected, it is time to build your plan. The following steps can help you get started.

Create a timeline.
If possible, have your Company’s leadership team provide you with a “hard date” as to when they want the move to be completed. Test the logic behind the date. Is it feasible? Will the building be ready to occupy? Will the timing of the move disrupt business during peak months? Can everyone be moved by that date? Remember, once you agree on a date (whether you had input or not) you will be measured according to whether or not you hit the date. If it is not possible to establish a specific date, you will need to recognize that you are working against a moving target that will add complexity to the timing of the move as well as stress and anxiety for the employees moving. In addition, a group move without a hard date complicates the entire process, as there is always an implication of having “more time.” Determine your schedule for accomplishing each element of the project. You will also want to establish a timetable for acceptance once employees are invited.

Gather data about the people who will be impacted by the move.
This will include both those who are moving as well as those who are not. For those who are moving, you need to gather a great deal of data, including:

• Current position
• Tenure with the Company
• New position
• Current salary
• New salary
• Current manager
• New manager
• Family information
• Homeowner or renter information
• Current address
• Expected move date

Review your current corporate relocation policy to evaluate whether it will support the objectives of the move. (Read more).

Here are a few things to remember when instituting a cross-cultural awareness program into your corporate relocation program. For a full account of information regarding this service visit our resource library.

Don't forget the family
Just as spouses should be involved in the assignment selection process, they should be involved in training for global assignments. Some experts estimate that nearly 80 percent of all failed global (international) assignments can be linked to the spouse's inability to adjust to the new environment. Each member of the family faces special issues in the expatriate environment that should be addressed.

Other cultural resources
Organizations should consider utilizing their returning expatriates for help with cultural awareness initiatives. Employees who have already completed similar assignments can act as subject matter experts (SMEs) to help new expatriates learn business customs and how to navigate foreign business circles. SMEs can also prove invaluable in helping new expatriates learn the hierarchy in companies with which they will be dealing. It's important to note, however, that companies should not rely solely on employees to provide guidance to new expatriates. Relying exclusively on veteran expatriates can be problematic if the guidance reinforces cultural stereotypes or results in the new expatriate adopting the predecessor's bad habits. While other international assignees have a role to play in helping newcomers adjust, they should not replace professional consultants/trainers.

Alternative views
Although cross-cultural awareness is important, some might argue that its importance is just a hyped up myth. In actuality, on average only 30 percent of American managers sent on international assignment lasting from one to five years receive any cross-cultural training. It can be argued that managing is simply "managing," so where it is done is irrelevant. Another point of view is that any type of short-term cultural training would be ineffective because people can't learn to work and live in a foreign culture after only a few days (or even a few weeks) of training. Others argue that an understanding of a country's culture is something people assimilate over many years based on personal experiences in that specific culture. Others will say that corporate culture takes precedence over country culture. For example, a local employee working for a "bullish" American firm in Thailand might show traits of aggressiveness and conflict, which are not traits normally associated with the Thai culture. These traits, however, may be common in the corporate company culture of the employee's organization, causing the Thai employee to act outside his or her normal cultural dimensions.

Nevertheless, in order to be successful, an expatriate must be comfortable with his or her staff, colleagues, clients and business atmosphere--regardless of location. Cultural specialists also agree that to be successful in dealing with people from other cultures, expatriates need knowledge about the cultural differences (and the similarities) among work locations. The global employee of today's business world can only benefit from gaining cultural awareness, either through direct training or personal experience, which would lead to greater professional effectiveness and company performance. Read more

If you would like more information about cross-cultural education and how it can be added to your international relocation package/program, please contact our corporate relocation consulting team.

What is a group move?
The definition of a group move is when 10 or more employees are being transferred from the same area and to the same area, at the same time, for the same business reason. Group moves are critical to the performance of the company and are of high strategic value in meeting the objectives of the business plan. If the group move is being driven by either a merger or an acquisition, the pressures only become greater as the already charged environment that a group move can create is compounded with the added factors of merging two different cultures. This reality, combined with the inherent risks that a merger or acquisition almost always adds, results in higher stakes and more pressure on corporate relocation program managers to make sure that the right group move process be in place.

Why do group moves fail?
In a series of internal reviews with subject matter experts who have had extensive experience in assisting our clients in planning and managing a wide range of corporate group moves, a number of reasons repeatedly rose to the top as to why a group move may fail:

• Announcing the move without adequate preparation or involvement
• Not having clearly defined objectives
• Lack of time and/or poor planning
• Losing control of the relocating transferees
• Not understanding the unique needs and dynamics of the group
• Not bringing outside resources in early enough
• Political pressure to use non-qualified suppliers
• Lack of senior management endorsement and involvement

How do you avoid the pitfalls? This topic will be covered in our next post. For more information about this subject or to view the complete white paper, visit our resource library.

Accurate and timely accounting of relocation expenses has a far-reaching impact on the overall performance and success of a corporate relocation program, to both the company and the individual transferee. With relocation costs per employee homeowner topping $70,000 in recent years (according to averages reported by Worldwide ERC), effective management of expenses can easily exceed several million dollars annually for a company. Because all relocation services funnel through the expense management function, to be appropriately recorded and paid, this function is a significant responsibility for those managing the relocation program. As a result, corporate relocation managers and/or payroll managers should consider several key issues when evaluating the effectiveness of the expense management process in their companies...read more.