From commodities to services: Applying the Basics

Tuesday, February 2, 2010 by SIRVA University

Jon Gilbertson, GMS, of SIRVA, Inc. and Susan Dawson of Genworth Financial discussed principles and techniques to apply to any RFP, contract or service relationship.

When developing an RF, there are many things that need to be considered during the process. Gilbertson and Dawson highlighted that for each program in your relocation policy you should have at least three questions related to the most critical service delivery process steps.

Specifications

The specifications in an RFP for commodities convey the style, appearance and quality of the product. The goal for specification of a service is to solicit information for you to understand how the specific service’s delivery steps will be satisfied. Be sure you are clear whether defining more specifications and expectation does not result in higher costs and higher management fees.

 

Evaluating

When evaluating RFPs, it is important to identify the importance of each service criteria by weighting or rating them on a scorecard. This can be done by your evaluation team scoring the comments and evidence that the supplier has provided. Gilbertson and Dawson give two ways to evaluate the RFP – the Business Process Review (BRP) or the Conference Room Pilot.

Business Process Review

The BRP is a walkthrough of the process to gain a better understanding of the clarifying comments by reviewing the process from beginning to end, clarifying gaps or questions in the process, asses any changes required and validating the potential supplier process.

 

Conference Room Pilot

The CRP approach is a more robust validation technique that validates real life scenarios by conducting an exercise with a team that would support your business. This can be done by role playing to assess answers and questions. This will help the team identify the gaps, review the process and make changes to the procedures.

 

However, the supplier assessment process doesn’t end at the RFP! Gilbertson and Dawson outlined 4 key categories to ensure the success of your service provider – Quality, performance, cost and continuous improvement. The process is continuous and clients should consistently change their policies and expectations. Equally important to keeping your expectations consistent, it is important to be aware and track the total cost when managing and assessing a supplier. Hidden fees can easily be lost and should be critical to consider in all relocation-related expenses.

To learn more about the RFP process, check out our other sessions at www.sirvauniversity.com.

Procuring Relo 101: basics, best practices and benchmarking

Tuesday, February 2, 2010 by SIRVA University

Procurement is more than just buying goods and services. When used correctly, it can be a tool that challenges current services and determines new models for service delivery. It is essential in improving services since third parties play an increasing role in service delivery.

At SIRVA University, Jon Gilbertson, GMS and Lauren Richards, CRP, GMS of Dell lent their expertise in procurement to educate the audience on the basics and best practices. According to Gilbertson and Richards, there are three steps for successful procurement – Plan, source/purchase and deliver.

Plan for Success

It is important to establish clear expectations, involve the correct people and ensure access to the right skills. The key function of the business must be aligned and in agreement with service expectations to reach the desired quality, while staying within your cost objectives. According to Gilbertson and Richards, building an RFP is also essential in the planning process. They put emphasis on two areas – creating a specific list of services and expectations and scoring a matrix with services and expectations based on your goals and objectives.

 

Source and Purchase

In the second step, sourcing and purchasing, Gilbertson and Richards put emphasis on moving to the external marketing by doing an RFI, a quick survey of providers to provide initial insight. This will give you an understanding of the market and will better able you to align expectations with qualified and proven market providers. After gaining initial insight, don’t rush into an RFP. Take time to update and reassess your requirements to all potential providers. In an initial RFP, potential providers should identify ways in which they will meet your expectations and needs. It is important when evaluating an RFP that you review the information in detail, evaluate the quotes against pre-determined criteria and narrow the list down to 2-3 that score the highest on your selection matrix. To purchase, select the supplier with lowest total cost and that will meet your expectations the highest. This can be done by reviewing the process from beginning to end using either a Business Process Review or a Conference Room Pilot.

Delivery and beyond

In the third step, delivery, it is imperative that we maintain involvement and improvement from the provider. The process doesn’t stop when the good or service is provided. It should continue to evolve and improve as time and technology increases. A scorecard should be kept based on these key areas – performance, quality, financial and improvements. Keep track of your expectations and any business needs that change.

 

Want to learn more about procurement? Check out our other procurement sessions at www.sirvauniversity.com.

SIRVA prepares to host its seventh annual SIRVA University

Tuesday, January 12, 2010 by SIRVA University



On February 1-3,
SIRVA will host its seventh annual SIRVA University at The Ritz Carlton in Palm Beach, Florida. In preparation for this three-day educational event, SIRVA has put together a noteworthy line-up of key speakers and industry leaders. Among the list includes, Marcus Buckingham, bestselling author and expert on Outstanding Leadership and Management Practices, as well as Dr. Marci Rosell, former Chief Economist for CNBC.

Visit this blog for up-to-the-minute updates as we live blog from Palm Beach, Florida.

The Seven Habits of Highly Effective Mortgage Applicants

Tuesday, May 12, 2009 by Paul Klemme

As relocation professionals, what are some things we can do to prepare our transferees to navigate through this complicated and confusing time?
The first and probably best thing a transferee can do is talk to a relocation lender early in the process. Knowing where you are and what you need to do is critical to avoid stress, as well as be in a position to be aggressive with a home purchase offer, close on your terms and complete a successful relocation. The up-front application discussion should cover these seven things to ensure a successful home purchase. 

1. Know Your Credit Report: Many people don’t know what is on their credit report, a complete review is necessary to understand your credit situation and fix any issues that may exist.

2. Be Prepared to Provide Documentation: Income and asset documentation is required now. With all of the changes that have occurred in the mortgage industry, the level of verification is considerably higher than it was a few years ago.
 
3. Do Research on Product Availability: There are still many products available to fit a variety of needs. Understanding what is available and how you qualify is essential.

4. Learn about Property Type Trends: With declining property values, some property types such as condominiums, and other unique housing types are experiencing resale issues as guidelines have become more restrictive on property issues. Preparing for this reality is essential in setting sale expectations.

5. Be Ready to Provide Information for Rate Calculations: Many applicants call to ask “what is your rate?”, but this isn’t an easy question to answer anymore. Interest rates take into consideration factors like credit, LTV, property type, location, and loan size—so be prepared to provide your loan counselor with additional information.

6. Get Pre-Approved: You can still be approved over the phone or online quickly and easily in most cases. By being approved up front, you will be in the best negotiating position when you are ready to buy.

7. Talk through the Complete Mortgage Process: A complete conversation will include the entire mortgage process. Understanding the what, when and whys of returning your documents, the home appraisal, your loan commitment as well as what is involved in closing your loan is critical. It is important to know exactly what you should expect after the closing. Setting the right expectation will lead to a successful transaction.

Talking to a professional relocation lender applies to those buying in the short, intermediate or long-term. Start the conversation early on and a successful purchase will follow.  Please contact me if you have any questions.
 

Why Home Sale Financing Incentives are Like Courting a Lady

Monday, March 30, 2009 by Paul Klemme

Home sales are complicated right now. Sellers must find a way for their home to stand out in the crowded listing space that exists today. One tool SIRVA Mortgage utilizes, to make their SIRVA Relocation listings stand out, are mortgage financing incentives. A listing with “SPECIAL FINANCING OPTIONS” in the MLS jumps out to prospective buyers. However, it must be the right incentive to work.  And that is why…

Finding the right financing incentives to sell a house is in many ways just like courting a lady. It is more art than science and several things must take place in the right combination to be successful.

You must:

  • Show interest
  • Attract attention and curiosity
  • Fit in with their interests
  • Invite her friends
  • Impress the parents


First, showing interest is critical whether getting a women’s attention or selling a house. Just as important is the speed at which you do it. Incentives should be put on as soon as the house is listed. The longer it takes to put an incentive on the more likely you have missed a buyer—the sooner the better.

Second, you will need to do something significant to attract attention. Cheap out and lose out. Significant does not mean expensive, it means quality attention getter. Being creative will add value and impress more than something commonplace.

Incentives should fit the interests of those you are seeking. Each home has a unique market that will attract buyers with certain needs. For example, maybe consider offering reduced closing costs for lower priced homes, lower interest rates for middle priced homes, temporary interest rate buydowns for higher-end homes or home improvement gift cards for the fixer-upper. Finding the right incentive can do wonders when trying to drive traffic into the home.Next, you should invite friends and all interested parties. Along with the transferee, the relocation counselor and realtor play a key role in making sure the home is listed correctly and with the right incentives. When everyone is involved, good things happen.Finally, you should impress the parents. The corporate client and the client contact are like the parents. By selling the home quickly, the costs of temporary housing, travel, duplicate housing and the possibility of going to a costly buyout are reduced. Additionally, the opportunity to earn a home sale bonus, if one is offered, increases along with the likelihood of a successful relocation. With the parents on board, success follows.

If you have questions on financing incentives please e-mail us at MortgageFacilitators@sirva.com , we would be happy to help. 

Don't Get Caught "Short" in a Declining Market

Tuesday, March 3, 2009 by hank roth

In today's real estate market, as declining property values and insufficient home resales are leading to negative-equity concerns, employers and transferees are frequently encountering terms such as "loss on sale" and "short sale". In order to continue with the home-sale process, transferees are looking to financial institutions for short-sale solutions, in which the lender or financial institution forgives a portion of the outstanding mortgage debt. In this month's Policy Matters, SIRVA will examine various implications of a short sale for both the transferee and employer.

Typical Scenarios and the True Short Sale: When faced with negative equity, a transferee has a few options to consider in order to move the home-sale process along: a loan from an employer or involving a financial institution for a true short sale are two options.

Financial Implications: Whether the employer agrees to provide a loan to the transferee or a lender permits a true short sale, it is essential that both the employer and transferee are aware of the financial and IRS tax implications involved in any transaction or agreement.

A Lengthy Process and Last Resort: It is important to identify all other opportunities available before considering a short sale. However, once the transferee believes they need to pursue a short-sale option, the transferee should contact their lender as soon as possible as short-sale agreements will take at least 60 days to complete.

Read the complete article now
 

Five Refinance Challenges That You Should Know About

Wednesday, February 25, 2009 by Paul Klemme

It’s a new lending world from the last time you obtained a mortgage loan. Here are some challenges the refinance market has in store for you.

Home Value
With the decrease in market values in just about every market, your home may not be worth what you think or what you need it to appraise for. Depending on your particular situation, you may not qualify or your loan terms may be different due to a lower appraised value that can cause a higher loan-to-value ratio. 

Loan Requirements
Qualifying for a loan is tougher than ever. Guidelines around higher cash reserves, higher credit scores and lower debt-to-income ratios have become standard. In addition, documentation around income is being required.  
 
Cash Out Refinances
Qualifying for taking cash or equity from your home is considerably more difficult and more costly with rates up to .75% higher on these loans. Expect less available cash due to lower home values and tighter lending restrictions.

Tangible Net Benefit
Regulations in many states require a clear tangible net benefit to be provided to the consumer when refinancing. Tangible net benefits are documented proof by your lender that your situation will improve under this new loan. For instance your interest rate going from 7 percent to 5 percent without excessive closing costs would be a tangible net benefit. 

Choosing the Right Provider
There are significant differences in rates, closing costs, up-front fees, programs and on-time closing by provider. You should shop providers carefully to find the best combination to fit your needs.

The refinance market space can still help many home owners save thousands of dollars. Know what you are getting into, do your homework and be realistic about what you can achieve.

SIRVA Mortgage also provides a free consultation to any transferee to compare Good Faith Estimates (GFE). The consultation will ensure the transferee has “apples to apples” comparison on refinance options. 

For more information visit http://www.sirva.com/CorpRelo_Mortgage_Landing.aspx
 

Are Home Sale Benefits Collectible From Transferees Under a Payback Agreement?

Wednesday, February 18, 2009 by hank roth

Even before the current economic crisis, a majority of companies required transferees to sign repayment agreements, under which the employee agrees to repay relocation benefits if they leave the company within some specified period after being transferred.

Such agreements commonly include a requirement to repay costs that were incurred by the employer to acquire and dispose of the employee’s home in the departure location under a home purchase program. Such costs are usually the largest part of the expenses incurred to move the employee. 
If a home purchase program is properly organized and implemented, IRS agrees that costs incurred are not taxable to the employee. See Rev. Rul. 2005-74. However, employers sometimes express concern that inclusion of those costs in a repayment agreement is somehow inconsistent with the original exclusion of the costs from income.

That concern is not well-founded. 

A repayment agreement simply imposes a condition on the employer’s willingness to undertake the expense of moving the employee. It does not operate to characterize any of the expenses as employee benefits, either taxable or not taxable. The company incurred many costs to move the employee, some taxable and some not (for example, moving household goods). Under the repayment agreement the employee simply acknowledges that the employer expects a return on its investment in moving the employee. The benefit to the employer of incurring the costs will not be realized if the employee accepts relocation but then leaves employment within a short period of time.

Requiring the employee to repay such costs does not in any way suggest or imply that the costs were incurred to benefit the employee. Indeed, as discussed in the previous paragraph, it tends to suggest just the opposite. 

Moreover, when the employee does repay the home sale costs, the employee in effect has simply paid his or her own costs of home sale. There is no benefit to the employee at all, taxable or nontaxable. 

Consequently, including home sale costs in a repayment agreement should not be taken as suggesting that such costs were a taxable employee benefit in the first instance. 

However, as with all other costs included in a repayment agreement, the agreement should clearly specify the categories of cost that are subject to the agreement. Doing so will help the company to enforce the agreement, if that becomes necessary.

Reprinted from the Worldwide ERC Tax and Legal Mastersource with permission. Article prepared by Peter K. Scott, ERC Tax Counsel.

Check the Health of your Global Mobility Program

Wednesday, February 4, 2009 by Julian Yates


Some companies have very sophisticated well-thought-through global mobility programs that have been tried and tested for many years. Others are stepping into the global arena for the first time. Either way it doesn’t hurt to check the health of your global mobility program and consider what I would believe to be the 10 best practices to ensure your global relocation program is a successful one.

10 Best Practices to Ensure a Successful Global Relocation

  1. Policy
    1. Make sure you have a formal global policy in place that has been reviewed by your global relocation provider for competitiveness and efficiency and bench-marked against industry standards.Candidate Selection
  2. Candidate Selection
    1. Utilize pre-decision surveys or interviews to ensure that your candidate is flexible, adaptable and ready to take on the challenge of an international assignment.
  3. Benchmark
    1. Keep up-to-date as situations change, trends develop, and new products come to market.
  4. Cost Estimates
    1. In today’s economic environment it’s prudent to have a cost estimate completed before sending someone on an assignment so you have an idea how much it is going to cost.
  5. Cost Analysis
    1. Know what you’re spending and what policy changes or exceptions are costing or saving money. There are many examples of companies focusing on elements that are inexpensive and denying them, while allowing exceptions for other elements that are very expensive.
  6. Track Exceptions
    1. Be sure to always track any policy exception that was made or declined and the cost of that exception. This will help you be consistent in how you treat other exception requests in the future.
  7. Use Proven Providers
    1. Proven providers can give you good advice on all elements of a global relocation and can make the process easier for you.
  8. Don’t Cut Corners to Reduce Costs
    1. There is usually a good reason to do something well.
  9. Create a Repatriation and Reintegration Plan Well Before the Assignment Ends!
    1. If you don’t, you may risk losing a valuable employee. Statistics show that up to 70 percent of repatriated assignees leave their employer within two years, usually to join a competitor.

For more information on the above global mobility program components and services, please contact SIRVA Relocation for a consultation.

 

How to Effectively Plan for a Group Move: Critical Questions

Tuesday, February 3, 2009 by SIRVA Relopinion

Before you announce that a corporate group move (or relocation) is taking place, it is important to be prepared. A part of that will be identifying the resources you will need. Consider all the internal departments that need to be involved or will be impacted by the move. Evaluate if you need to bring in outside resources to assist you in managing the move.

Too often people underestimate the complexity of a group move and the critical need to have the time to properly prepare for the move prior to it being announced. For those employees who are moving, as well as those employees who are not going to move, you or someone on the team need to have the answers to a number of critical questions such as:

Questions that need to be answered for employees who are moving:

  • What organizational units and types of jobs will be involved?
  • How many jobs will be moved? From where? To where?
  • Has selection criteria been established? Will the criteria be publicized?
  • How will transferees be selected and invited? What will be the administrative process for job offer and acceptance?
  • Will transferees’ departure-area jobs be re-filled? If so, how?
  • How many job openings in the new facility will be filled locally?
  • Will there be new-hires to be relocated?
  • Will group move relocation benefits expire at a certain point in time?

Questions that need to be answered for employees who are not moving:

  • Why wasn’t I asked to move?
  • Will I be offered a new job?
  • Do I need to apply for it?
  • When will my current job end?
  • Will there be a stay or retention bonus?
  • Is there a severance package?
  • If a job opens up at the new location, can I apply for it?
  • Can I apply for a job at another location?
To learn more, visit the SIRVA Resource Library

Mortgage Rates Are Low For a Reason

Tuesday, January 27, 2009 by Paul Klemme



Mortgage rates are currently at a 40 year low. The low mortgage interest rates are the result of a combined effort of the Federal Reserve and Treasury Department. On November 25, 2008 the treasury department announced they were buying $500 billion of mortgage backed securities and agency debt as a separate action beyond the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) funding. They wanted to create the perception that mortgage backed securities are liquid and safe. The plan had a dramatic effect as mortgage interest rates dropped by over one percent in a two-week period and created a refinance boom that is expected to continue for most of this year. The thought is that low rates will drive consumer spending and increase bank lending.

The intent of low interest rates is to drive buyers into the market by creating a more affordable mortgage. These historically low mortgage rates will save consumers hundreds or even thousands of dollars a year. This will create a waterfall effect in that the low rates will drive both new and buy-up consumers into the housing market. This will assist in creating home sale activity and allow home values to stabilize. 

This plan also considered how consumer confidence can play a role in turning around the housing market and overall economy. Consumer confidence is arguably one of the best indicators of future consumer spending. These low rates will free up cash flow for consumer spending that will provide businesses reason to expand.

These measures have been part of a well thought out plan and could prove to be one of the reasons the economic recovery will take place.

Transferees Need to Adjust to a Slow Housing Recovery

Thursday, January 22, 2009 by David Barlow


Now may be a good time to reflect on the fact that the “bursting of the housing bubble,"which impacted many parts of the United States, was preceded by record setting increases in home prices. While most of the country has seen two year price decreases, some areas like Las Vegas (down 37%), Phoenix (down 39%) and Miami (down 38%) stand out as being especially hard hit. Some experts are now saying that it may take decades for home prices to recover and that we should expect price growth to revert to more post World War II “historical norms." By historical norms we mean that housing prices are much more likely to rise consistent with income levels and inflation. This reality has not been lost on the real estate speculator (now driven out of the market) but what does this mean for corporate relocation transferees? Transferees need to be counseled through the home sale process to ensure that they are basing their decision-making process on current market conditions. For example:

  1. The new home is less likely to appreciate during their years of occupancy
  2. They should not only buy a home they can afford, but one that they will live in until their next transfer
  3. Transferees should choose a home that will suit their long-term needs, as the ability to leverage home appreciation to “buy up” is far more difficult

For more information about counseling your transferees through the the corporate relocation home sale process, please contact SIRVA

Employer-provided Relocation Loans

Wednesday, January 21, 2009 by hank roth

In today’s precarious economy, many employers are considering giving relocation loans to employees. Several of these employers may not have provided relocation loans to employees before, but are now looking for ways to increase the opportunity to make such loans available.  .

A relocation loan that is done correctly can be offered to the employee interest-free and without exposure to creating imputed interest to the employee which would be treated by the Internal Revenue Service as compensation income.

The following information concerning below market rate loans is an excerpt from an article published by the Worldwide Employee Relocation Council® (ERC) in its Tax and Legal MasterSource:

A. Types of relocation loans

1. Mortgage loans

A mortgage loan is extended by the employer to the employee with the understanding that the employee will use the proceeds of the loan to purchase a new principal residence. Such loan may be a demand or term loan, and is conditioned on the future performance of substantial services for the employer. The loan may have a market interest rate, a below market interest rate, or no interest at all.

2. Equity bridge loans

A loan may be offered to an employee in order to enable the employee to receive the equity out of an old unsold residence to make the down payment on a new residence. The terms of the loan may require that the proceeds be repaid within a short time after the sale of the former residence. The loan may have a market interest rate, or a below market interest rate, or no interest at all.

B. Imputation of interest on a loan transaction

1. Explanation of imputed interest

When a loan is made at a below market interest rate, or with no interest at all, the Internal Revenue Code may impute interest to the loan even though the lender and borrower never did. If imputed interest rules apply to an employee relocation loan, the amount by which a market rate of interest exceeds the loan’s actual rate of interest is considered income to the employee borrower. (The market rate used is the "applicable federal rate," which is computed by the IRS under a formula in the Internal Revenue Code and periodically adjusted.) This income is considered to be derived from the employer-lender, because the employer-lender is considered to have paid interest on the loan to itself on behalf of the employee-borrower.

2. An example of imputed interest

An example of imputed interest may be helpful in understanding this complex area. Assume that the employer has made an interest-free bridge loan to the employee. The market rate of interest on the loan would be $100 per month if interest were charged by the employer-lender. No interest is paid by the employee-borrower or received by the employer-lender. However, the tax law considers the employee-borrower to have owed $100 of interest, and since the employee’s obligation to pay this $100 was satisfied by the employer-lender, the transaction is treated as though the employer-lender paid $100 per month to the employee-borrower, who then repaid it to the employer-lender. This characterization of the transaction gives rise to $100 per month of compensation income to the employee-borrower.

3. Reporting requirements for imputed interest

The employee-borrower must report imputed income on his/her tax return, even though the employee never received it, but then may be entitled to a corresponding deduction for the interest theoretically paid on the employee’s behalf by the employer-lender.

4. Negative tax consequences of imputed interest

If interest is imputed to loans it has negative tax consequences for the employer-lender and may have for the employee-borrower. The employer-lender must pay payroll taxes (FICA, RRTA, and FUTA) on the amounts imputed as interest income to the employee-borrower. (The employer-lender, however, does not have to withhold federal income taxes on the imputed interest income.) The employee-borrower may or may not be eligible for a deduction of the imputed interest. The interest on a mortgage or bridge loan may be deductible as "qualified residence interest" under the general rules applicable to homeowners. However, there may be situations in which interest income is imputed to the employee, but the employee is unable to take a corresponding interest deduction. For example, there is a $100,000 limit on the amount of home equity debt upon which interest is deductible.

C. Avoidance of imputed interest

1. De minimis exception

If the total principal amount of the employer’s mortgage loan, bridge loan, or both outstanding to the employee does not exceed $10,000 during the year, the loans are ex-empted from the imputed interest rules due to their small size. No interest will be imputed in this situation.

2. Exemption for employee relocation loans under regulation 1.7872-5T

Under a temporary regulation, imputed interest will not apply to compensation-related mortgage or bridge loans if the following requirements are met:

      a. Exemption for mortgage loans

          The loan agreement must require the following provisions:

i. The proceeds of the loan must be used only to purchase the new residence.

ii. Such loans must be secured by a mortgage on the new principal residence acquired in connection with the relocation of the employee to a new principal place of work.

iii. The loan must be a demand or term loan.

iv. The benefits of the interest arrangements must not be transferable.

v. The below market interest rate (or the lack of interest) must be conditioned on the future performance of substantial services by the employee.

vi. The employee must certify to the employer that the employee reasonably expects to itemize deductions for each year the loan is outstanding.

     b. Exemption for bridge loans

The terms of the bridge loan must meet all the requirements for the mortgage loan as stated above except for the security requirement. Note, however, that any interest actually charged on a bridge loan will not be deductible by the transferee unless the loan is secured by either the old or new residence. In addition, the bridge loan agreement must provide that the loan is payable in full within 15 days after the sale of the employee’s immediately former principal residence. The aggregate of the principal amount of all outstanding bridge loans must not be greater than the employer’s reasonable estimate of the equity in the former residence. The former residence must not be converted to business or investment use.

     c. An unresolved issue

One issue that remains unresolved under the temporary regulation is whether the exemption applies in situations where imputed interest would not be deductible under the general rules applicable to home mortgage loan interest deductions. This problem is particularly acute for bridge loans, which are often unsecured by either the old or new residence, and, even if secured by the old residence may be considered home equity loans, and therefore limited to $100,000 of principal on which interest would be deductible. Although the IRS has not spoken to this issue, it is arguable that the 1986 Tax Reform Act, which imposed the current limitations on deductibility of interest, would be held to modify the exemption contained in the temporary regulation. However, in the absence of any IRS statement of position, it should be assumed that the regulation may still be relied upon. The IRS continues to follow the regulation, and has shown no interest in revisiting it.

 

Loss-on-Sale Assistance: A Necessity in Today's Risky Real Estate Environment

Tuesday, January 20, 2009 by David Barlow

 The current real estate market continues to drive home values down significantly, frequently resulting in sellers being unable to sell their homes for more than the original purchase price. This situation adds financial strain on transferees and leads to loss-on-sale, namely the difference between what a home sells for in relation to the price at which it was purchased.

Today, companies are taking measures to assist transferees by modifying their loss-on-sale programs to reflect the continuing deterioration in the housing markets. If companies currently do not have a loss-on-sale program in place, they are working to add these elements into their policies in order to help protect transferees from significant home value loss.

In this month's Policy Matters, SIRVA provides an inside look at the following aspects of designing and implementing a successful loss-on-sale program:  

Evaluate New Programs: Before implementing a loss-on-sale program, companies should always perform necessary due diligence on which program benefits should be offered, keeping consistent with a company's financial situation and industry best practices.

Re-evaluate Existing Programs: For companies that already have a loss-on-sale program in place, now is a good time to re-evaluate current program benefits to ensure overall effectiveness in today's real estate market.

Identify Other Contributing Factors: In this down real estate market, transferees could potentially be not only in a loss-on-sale situation but also subject to negative equity, which would need to be addressed before the home sale can proceed.

Read the complete article now.

 
 
 
 
 

Corporate Relocation Expenses: Deciding How to Manage the Process

Tuesday, January 13, 2009 by SIRVA Relopinion

Accurate and timely accounting of relocation expenses has a far-reaching impact on the overall performance and success of a corporate relocation program, to both the company and the individual transferee. An expense management process should support users without being burdensome, so they can concentrate on the other aspects of their jobs. Corporate relocation managers and/ or payroll managers should consider several key issues when evaluating the effectiveness of the expense management process in their companies.

Once a company has reviewed its current process and determined that improvements are needed, the next step is to decide how to make enhancements. In today’s business environment there are not many functions within an organization that are not a target for outsourcing, including expense management. And for a relocation manager, the decision to outsource this particular function will come with new questions that need to be addressed.

Questions to determine outsourcing readiness:

Is there an overall culture of familiarity with outsourcing transactional functions (e.g. benefits processing) that already exists within the company?

If the company has previously outsourced other functions, then formulating a plan to outsource the management of relocation expenses can be evaluated not only on its own merit, but can also rely on precedent and draw on successful processes that have been followed in the past. If this is not the case, then a transition project plan needs to be developed and approved.

Is this a core competency that the company has or wishes to retain?

Expense management is a very detailed process that requires an in-depth knowledge of the ever-changing tax laws and regulations at the federal and state levels. Part of the evaluation process is to assess the current depth of knowledge of the team and determine if it is adequate and can be sustained if team members change. In the end, the evaluation process may lead to questioning whether or not this is a function that should remain in-house.

To learn more about determining outsourcing readiness click here
 

Five Questions to Ask When Evaluating a Relocation Expense Management Provider

Tuesday, January 13, 2009 by SIRVA Relopinion
  1. Is there a customized, seamless integration with payroll?
     
  2. Is there a documented exception management process with the ability to track and report exceptions by type, division, cost center, etc.?
     
  3. Does the provider just “rubber stamp” exceptions, or is there a clear audit approach to policy compliance and approved exceptions?
     
  4. Does it provide cost-of-living allowances (COLA) and lump sum calculations?
     
  5. Is there a process in place for making timely and accurate payments on the employee’s behalf for recurring costs (temporary living, rent, etc.)?
     

Some Employees Unwilling to Relocate in the Current Real Estate Market

Thursday, January 8, 2009 by SIRVA Relopinion

We all know that real estate is local. However-in our current real estate situation-we are seeing more markets continue to see a slip in home sales with only a few who are reporting an increase. The National Association of Realtors (NAR) reports areas such as Colorado Springs, Colo., Sacramento, Calif. and Spartanburg, S.C. are experiencing double-digit pending sales gains compared to a year ago with a significant percentage of these sales attributed to investors who are buying foreclosed properties. So while some markets have seen tremendous growth in home sales compared to last year, others have seen contract signings slashed by as much as 50 percent.

The current real estate market for the typical residential home is still very much a buyer's market. Attractive interest rates, large inventories of homes for sale and lower-than-average sale prices make it a great time to buy. Sellers aren't so fortunate. In fact, some areas have seen home values drop so low that typically willing transferees are hesitant to take a corporate relocation because of loss-on-sale concerns or owing more on their properties than the current market value sales price.

According to a recent survey conducted by the Worldwide ERC®, the number one reason employees are reluctant to relocate is a direct effect of the troubled real estate market. The survey indicated that more than 95 percent of respondents reported "slowed real estate appreciation at the old location," as the reason their employees are averse to moving. This is a stark contrast from last year when only 16 percent cited the real estate market as the reason for their reluctance. Instead, high housing costs, high cost-of-living and family resistance to move, were top concerns.

"Today, it's an unfortunate fact that those true soldiers that have faithfully relocated every two to three years are cooling to the idea because of the economy and the fear that they will take a considerable home loss-on-sale," says David Barlow, SIRVA's senior consultant. 

Barlow advises companies that have not done so to consider implementing a loss-on-sale policy to remain competitive and to help their transferees with the reality of falling home values and sale prices. He also advises companies that already have a loss-on-sale policy to re-evaluate the loss-on-sale limit or cap to ensure it is sufficient in today's difficult real estate market.

It's no secret that the current real estate market has had a significant impact on the relocation industry. Companies have had to reevaluate and update their corporate relocation policies to overcome the challenges of the current market.

Barlow doesn't wager a guess on when the market will turn, but he expects companies will be working through the challenges of the current real estate market for some time to come.
 

Effects of Exchange Rate Movement on Expatriate Compensation

Tuesday, December 23, 2008 by Julian Yates


In case you haven’t noticed there have been some significant exchange rate movements in the past few months due to the global financial crisis that is churning. International HR professionals are well aware of this and so are expatriates whose compensation packages appear to be impacted by such movements.

For example, the U.S. dollar has declined significantly since late 2006; it then rebounded abruptly in the Fall of 2008. Five currencies have experienced noticeable changes in the last two months, the Australian Dollar (AUD), the Brazilian Real (BRL), the Canadian Dollar (CAD), the British Pound (GBP) and the South-Korean Won (KRW).

So what should companies do about this? First, they should use specialist third party organizations such as ORC and Air Inc. to provide advice on cost-of-living data and other related information to help provide accurate solutions. These companies use complex formulas to track cost-of-living and related exchange rates to minimize the negative financial impact that currency fluctuations can have on expatriates living under one currency but being remunerated in another currency. 

Such currency volatility is not unprecedented, and urgent action is not normally required as long as allowances and payments are reviewed frequently; for example moving to a quarterly review may be worth considering. Only where inflation is running out of control should exchange rates be considered more frequently (e.g. Zimbabwe), but in these extreme cases, a local currency should be avoided if possible.

Below are some solutions that should be considered:

  • Quarterly reviews of allowances and payments made in an affected currency
  • Consider a split pay approach that would deliver a combined goods and services amount normally spent at home, plus a goods and services differential in the host currency
  • Communicate with expatriates, to show how their purchasing power is being protected

For assistance in reviewing your company’s global mobility policies and process related to expatriate compensation, please contact SIRVA.

Making the best of your relocation program during the worst of economic times

Friday, December 19, 2008 by David Barlow

Here at SIRVA our clients are increasingly asking how the continuous economic turmoil impacts their company insofar as their relocation program is concerned. Specifically, they want to know how their company can continue to effectively and efficiently hire new employees and relocate existing employees during these difficult times.

So what should companies do in such challenging times insofar as relocation is concerned? In addition to learning how to better leverage relocation policies currently in place, this is the optimal time for companies to look at some of the innovative and time-tested relocation program provisions that are proving highly effective at protecting both your company and your employees. Here are some suggestions:

Best Practices for Home Sale:
Making sure your relocation program includes four (4) critical home sale provisions—regardless of what type of home sale program you have—and how to effectively enforce expectations.

Loss On Sale and Negative Equity:
An inside look at the innovative new options for the company and the transferee in these two complicated, yet frequently encountered, situations.

Pre-Decision Analysis:
Before the formal relocation process is started, companies need to assess whether candidates are able to actually complete the relocation in today’s economic climate.

Read the complete article now

Fixed-fee Relocation Home Sale Programs Improve Predictability and Reduce Real Estate Risk in Slow Housing Market

Thursday, December 18, 2008 by SIRVA Relopinion



The U.S. housing market is continuing to slow, and most economists and housing professionals predict the housing slump will linger longer than previously forecasted.

A downturn in real estate markets creates several challenges for employers' relocating transferees, the most significant of which is the growing number of homes that end up in inventory. This rise in home inventory leads to higher overall relocation costs and increased property management duties for employers.

Total home sale costs also become less predictable in sluggish real estate markets, and unpredictable home sale costs translate into unpredictable total relocation costs.

Relocation service providers (RSPs) offer several home sale programs, each with varying levels of risk, to help corporate relocation transferees. Employers should consider the advantages and disadvantages of each program to determine the level of risk involved, and those employers who want a predictable and low-risk home sale program should consider a fixed-fee program.

Learn more about the fixed-fee program.