Wes Lucas CEO

On February 1-3, SIRVA will host its seventh annual SIRVA University at The Ritz Carlton in Palm Beach, Florida. In preparation for this three-day educational event, SIRVA has put together a noteworthy line-up of key speakers and industry leaders. Among the list includes, Marcus Buckingham, bestselling author and expert on Outstanding Leadership and Management Practices, as well as Dr. Marci Rosell, former Chief Economist for CNBC.

Visit this blog for up-to-the-minute updates as we live blog from Palm Beach, Florida.

On December 5, 2008, SIRVA announced the appointment of David Byers as the Company’s new chief commercial officer. Byers brings more than two decades of operations, marketing, sales and brand management experience from H&R Block and Foote, Cone&Belding Inc. to SIRVA.

“David’s deep knowledge base in financial products and services, and his experience in developing and managing brands will help drive our relocation services business,” said SIRVA President and Chief Executive Wes Lucas. “Similarly, his background working with distribution networks will bring tremendous value to our moving business.”

Byers was with H&R Block for eight years and progressed quickly through the ranks, from senior vice president and global chief marketing officer to senior vice president of U.S. operations, and most recently, chief operating officer of retail tax services. In these roles, he was responsible for H&R Block’s U.S. operations, sales and business development functions, which comprised more than 13,000 retail locations and 100,000 employees. Prior to H&R Block, Byers’ career included working for global advertising agency Foote, Cone & Belding Inc., Del Monte Corporation, and most recently, he served as chief executive officer of The Mutual Fund Store.

See Press Release
 

According to the Trippel Survey&Research LLC Seventh Annual Relocation Managers Survey: Relocation Management Company Industry©, SIRVA Relocation ranked second in overall performance and satisfaction among the industry’s top six largest relocation companies. The company achieved the highest scores among the six largest relocation providers in eight of the 24 areas surveyed, and it also placed as one of the top three providers in 22 out of 24 areas surveyed among the largest relocation providers. SIRVA Relocation LLC is a subsidiary of SIRVA Inc., a leading global relocation services provider.

“These results are a direct reflection of our steadfast commitment to providing our customers with unparalleled service and value every day,” said SIRVA Inc. CEO Wes Lucas. “Our goal is to be the most trusted and sought-after relocation services provider in the industry based on the work we do and solutions we offer. I am elated to see that customers are recognizing the value we bring to the table.”

Trippel Survey&Research conducted this survey—which launched September 12 and concluded October 1—with the goal of obtaining evaluations from corporate relocation managers regarding levels of satisfaction with firms in the relocation industry. More than 300 survey evaluations—representing 298 different relocation management companies—were received. The six largest relocation management companies in the survey accounted for nearly 75 percent of all evaluations returned.

Categories in which SIRVA Relocation achieved the top score included: Responsiveness and flexibility to your needs; Service recovery; Year-end tax reporting; Management reporting; Identifying trends and responding to them; Suggesting policy recommendations; Suggesting ways to reduce your costs; and Taking actions that control or lower direct real estate costs.

On November 6, 2008, SIRVA announced the appointment of Sean Fernandez as the company’s new senior vice president, operational excellence, people and infrastructure. Fernandez brings 19 years of leadership, operations and consulting experience to SIRVA. He will report to SIRVA President and Chief Executive Officer Wes Lucas, and work from SIRVA’s office in Fort Wayne, Ind.

Fernandez is a proven global executive with an excellent track record in improving business performance and growing companies. Specifically, he has driven improvements in operations, quality and customer satisfaction. In his new role, Fernandez is responsible for overseeing SIRVA’s global operational excellence initiative, building strong teams and a high-performance organization and enhancing information technology capability. This position includes the development and implementation of key process improvements designed to drive customer satisfaction, cost efficiencies and improved quality.

“We are delighted to welcome Sean to the SIRVA team,” said Wes Lucas. “He is an outstanding leader and brings valuable operational capabilities, process improvement skills, product management and a proven ability to grow companies. I am confident that he will play an integral role in helping our company to serve our global customer base.”

See full press release

On November 6, 2008, SIRVA announced the appointment of Gordon Smith as the Company’s new chief financial officer. Mr. Smith, who will work from the Company’s Westmont, Ill., headquarters, brings more than 31 years of financial leadership experience from GE Capital and Asbury Automotive Group to SIRVA. He will report to SIRVA President and Chief Executive Officer Wes Lucas.

“We take great pleasure in welcoming Gordon to the SIRVA team,” said Wes Lucas. “A highly capable and proven finance executive, with outstanding financial leadership experience, Gordon is ideal to lead SIRVA’s financial areas as we build on our strong financial position, deliver outstanding service to our clients, grow our business and continue to create the world’s premier corporate relocation and moving services company.”

See full press release

Last month I posted a story about Mr. Jones who worked through a short sale situation.  This month we highlight Mr. Johnson who lives a few doors down from Mr. Jones.

Mr. Johnson has had his house listed for 120 days. Home values continue to decline and there are few buyers in the market. Mr. Johnson has received considerable pressure from his new manager to get moved and settled into his destination city. Mr. Johnson isn’t sure what he should do or what solutions may be available to him.

This relocation situation has become more common in today's market. With the tightening of qualifying guidelines, available options have become limited in the past year. The current solutions include:

• Qualify with both the existing home and the new home mortgage payments
• Rent the existing home
• Hold off from buying until the existing home is sold

Qualifying with both house payments
If a current residence is under contract for sale but has not yet closed, and a transferee is purchasing in the destination city, both the current and the proposed payments must be used in qualifying for the new mortgage loan. In addition, loan underwriting guidelines will require:

• Minimum cash reserves of six months principal, interest, taxes and insurance (PITI) for both properties if the equity in the existing residence is less than 30 percent
• Minimum cash reserves of two months principal, interest, taxes and insurance (PITI) for both properties if the equity in the existing residence is 30 percent or more

Underwriting guidelines will not require the PITI of the existing home to be counted against the transferee if:

• The above cash reserve requirement is met
• The current residence is under an executed sales contract
• There is confirmation that any financing contingency has been cleared**
  
  ** Guaranteed purchase offer agreements can be used to replace executed
  contracts with outside buyers in the case of a relocation loan. The purchase offer must be guaranteed and agreement must be in force.

Renting the existing home
Lending underwriting guidelines allow up to 75 percent of the rental income to be used to offset the current mortgage payment for qualifying purposes if all of the following requirements are met:

• There is documented equity of at least 30 percent in the current property (derived from an appraisal, AVM or BPO less all outstanding liens)
• There is a fully executed 12 month lease agreement
• There is a copy of the security deposit from the tenant and confirmation of deposit into the borrower’s account

If the 30 percent equity in the property cannot be documented, the rental income may not be used to offset the mortgage payment. Both the current and the proposed payments must be used to qualify for the new transaction and six months of PITI for both properties would need to be in cash reserves.

Hold off buying until your existing home sells
This is the option we see most transferees accept. Unfortunately, with the decline in the real estate market and decrease in home sales—we see relocation fatigue, an increase in temporary living costs and cancelled moves. Staying consistent with your communication messages to transferees is important during the listing period. Encouraging aggressive marketing tactics and active involvement with the listing agent will help the transferee through this time. See David Barlow’s blog on Navigating the Real Estate Market for more information.

After reviewing his options Mr. Johnson’s next concern is his down payment. We will look at the possible solutions for a down payment next month and see how Mr. Johnson is progressing with his move.

There has been a lot of news on the government bailout of financial institutions that are burdened with bad debt. Although difficult to comprehend how we got here, a non-partisan explanation and impact on relocation may be helpful.

First, let’s understand what the bailout is and is not. The official name is the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) and is the largest financial assistance since the great depression. It is intended to reduce non-performing assets (loans) of financial institutions. The most common non-performing loans are those which have been foreclosed upon or where the owner is struggling to pay the mortgage payment. By the government buying troubled assets from these institutions, the market can regain confidence in the institutions and the credit markets and begin to improve the credit flow that has been restricted recently due to weakened balance sheets. If left unaddressed the flow of credit and liquidity to the market will be shut off collapsing the free flow of capital—creating world wide business failures and an economic depression.

The function of TARP would be to clean up and renegotiate payments for struggling home owners as well as dispose of failing assets for financial institutions. Any asset that was sold under this program would be considered income and offset the money advanced for this program. We should expect two or more years of this activity to clean up those assets.

A few statements of what the bailout is not. It is not a mechanism to give unsecured cash to troubled companies. It is not giving away the asset it is trying to sell. It is not a way to give excessive executive pay. It is not funding the $700 billion up-front.

The impact on relocation will be immediate. By providing confidence in the credit markets, the real estate market will improve and stimulate additional home sale activity and reduce the fall in real estate prices. Additionally, lenders will continue to have mortgage products and the funds to lend, which will support the real estate market. Corporations will have confidence in the economy and will begin to expand, further driving growth. Without this bailout the world economy and markets could collapse in a way not seen since the 1930’s.

Imagine that you are just leaving a meeting where you were told that your employer has decided to relocate a group of people from one location to another. The CEO told you that you are expected to manage the move. He/she stresses to you that the success of this group move is critical to the future of the company and everyone is counting on you to, "make it happen." Any number of business scenarios could lead to this decision.

Even though this may be your first experience in managing a group move, you may have heard stories about the stress group moves can bring to an organization and the people who are working on the relocation. You may recall hearing how a group move does not always turn out as planned, and that a lot can change between the time the plan is initiated and the last employee is in place at the new location.

Whatever you do, you need to be prepared for the responsibility of:

• Business disruption
• Talent loss
• Low employee morale
• Cost overruns
• Having your plan for the move challenged by others

You may not be able to eliminate all of the issues, but if you can bring an effective plan to the project and assemble the right team to execute the plan, the odds that the move will be a success and that you will survive the group move will be greatly  improved. The intent of our "How to Effectively Plan for a Group Move" white paper is to provide you with a proven approach to effective group move management.

 View white paper

If you would like more information about corporate relocation services including group move management consulting, contact us.

Over the past few years, a trend has developed with regards to the localization of expatriates. An increasing number of organizations are either adding localization as a new element to their global mobility program or expanding on existing policy and practices—the main driver of this trend is cost containment.

As a refresher—localization is the process when an employee is moved off of the expatriate package and integrated into the host country on local terms of employment.

What Triggers Localization
Localization is usually triggered by a pre-defined limit to assignment length, most commonly three to five years. It is best to proactively address this threshold either in a global assignment policy and/or in the expatriate’s letter of assignment. By communicating a location policy early on in the assignment process, an organization can reduce unplanned or ad-hoc localizations, reduce expatriate demands and negotiations, and reduce the overall “shock” factor to employees.

What Approach to Take
There are a few different approaches to recognize when managing localizations. The first and most common approach is a straight localization, which entails immediately eliminating all expatriate benefits, e.g. housing, COLA, home leave, etc., on the effective date of localization. To execute a straight localization, it is important that the organization has a clearly defined localization process, and re-communicates the process and policy to the expatriate as early as possible. Not surprisingly, moving from a full benefit package to no additional assistance can cause great strain on the employee, especially if they have family accompanying them on the assignment.

The second approach is to phase out the expatriate package over a pre-determined length of time. The transition over to a “local” package can take anywhere from six months to two years. For example, many companies continue to pay a reduced housing allowance for six to twelve months after the effective date of localization. Other provisions that tend to be phased out in exceptional cases include education assistance and home leave.

Another approach is the lump sum approach. This involves the expatriate immediately transferring to local employment. A lump sum payment, however, is offered to the employee to alleviate some of the financial strain of localization. The lump sum can be used to cover education costs of children, assist with home finding and purchase, or to ship household goods from the home country. A lump sum approach is ideal for organizations that like to remain flexible and give their employees the freedom to decide how they want to utilize the localization assistance.

Relocating is often a stressful and confusing event in anyone’s life and career, especially if the transferee is going through his/her first relocation. Lack of role clarity (who does what) and inadequate information throughout the process will not only amplify a transferee’s stress, but will also directly impact the outcome of the corporate relocation. There are a number of measures that can be taken to make the relocation process easier. One key action is to include a section in the relocation policy that defines specific roles and responsibilities of all transferee resources.

When defining roles and responsibilities during the relocation process, there are a number of key points to remember. We are going to outline a few of them here, but encourage you to view the complete article in our Resource Library.

Internal and external resources
Include internal and external resources when defining roles. In many cases, the transferee is starting a new position with the organization and may not immediately understand where to go for support. Identifying internal resources early in the relocation process will enable the transferee to assimilate into the new organization quicker, he/she will feel more comfortable, and will also feel more in control of the relocation.

Setting transferee expectations
Clearly lay out the company’s expectations for the transferee during the relocation. This will help prevent the employee from straying outside the policy and limit the need for exceptions. Decreasing exceptions goes a long way toward alleviating the dissatisfaction that can result if a transferee finds out they were treated differently than others at their same salary or grade level. More and more companies have placed wording in their policies that clearly outlines that exceptions are not expected, and if requested, will be escalated to a senior-level executive for approval. It should be noted in policy that the transferee is a visible representation of your company and needs to act and behave in accordance with your company’s code of conduct.

View more points to keep in mind when defining roles and responsibilities for corporate relocations.

When localizing an expatriate, there are several compensation items that need to be considered. Here is a checklist to use a guideline:

1. Base salary. Should the employee be "re-priced" to the local market pay structure? Should a premium be offered for international experience? Many organizations move the employee to local salary levels. If there is an extreme difference in salary levels (either lower or higher), however, a phased-in approach is often carried out. On the other hand, oftentimes organizations justify paying an expatriate on a higher pay structure because of his/her international experience and business relationships with the home office.

2. Retirement benefits. Because retirement plans, social security and pensions do not cross national boundaries, this is often the most difficult item to transition. Often employees have expectations to remain on their home country retirement program, but unfortunately there is no typical solution to bridge the gap between country plans. Some basic alternatives include retaining the employee in a tax-qualified home country plan, simply transferring to the local plan or using an umbrella-funded plan.

3. Income taxes. Normally, the expatriate will simply transfer to the local tax system. This is not a problem for most of the world. American workers, however, are put in a difficult situation because they are taxed on a worldwide basis. Many organizations will continue the "tax equalization" process on an as-needed basis to prevent double taxation on American expatriates. Employees of other nationalities do not require such assistance.

4. Housing. It is recommended that organizations remain flexible regarding host country housing because many factors come into play when deciding how to handle housing for the expatriate. In many locations throughout the world, expatriate housing is vastly different than local standards and expectations. In some cases, it may be unreasonable to expect an expatriate to move into a local neighborhood or local style housing, e.g. Mumbai, Beijing, Jakarta, etc. Therefore, if the expatriate is moved to the local salary structure, a housing allowance may be needed to subsidize continued living in expatriate style housing. Other issues that arise with housing tax issues, family matters, property ownership laws, home search assistance and moving costs.

5. G&S differential/assignment incentives. In locations where assignees receive a G&S differential, the common practice is to immediately stop the allowance. Other options include a phase-out or lump-sum buyout, although it is rare for companies to continue to pay a G&S allowance beyond the effective localization date. Other assignment incentives such as mobility premiums, hardship allowances, etc. are also normally stopped upon conversion to local status.

6. Education for dependent children. After housing, this item is the most commonly subsidized cost after an expatriate is localized, especially if the local schools are inadequate based on international standards or if the host country language is an issue. To alleviate the problem, organizations should consider continuing education coverage, or pay a percentage of the education costs for one to two years.

7. Health care. Health care standards and costs vary greatly in different parts of the world and is a priority issue for most employees and their families. Normally, localizing employees will simply transfer into the local health care system, but concerns will arise if the health coverage in the new location is of a lower standard than in the home location. This will be a costly change for an employee coming into the United States, where typically the health care is more expensive. Because of their time spent in the host country, a localized employee will most likely be aware of the issues, and therefore be in a position to make appropriate decisions.

Finally, localization may subject the employee and the company to various employment laws and regulations that apply to employees hired by local companies. It is important to speak with a local employment counsel to understand the legal effects and ramifications of localization, including subjecting the company to stringent employment laws in some European countries.
Localizing expatriates can be a complicated process and is not as simple as transferring expatriates to a local compensation package. By having a strategic plan in place, companies can anticipate potential localization issues and make the process as efficient as possible.

According to the latest forecast by the National Association of Realtors® (NAR), over the next few months, existing home sales in the United States are expected to hold fairly steady, then rise later in the year and continue to improve in 2009. NAR reports existing home sales for 2007 totaled 5.65 million, but projects home sales to edge up to 5.70 million this year and reach 5.91 million in 2009, which is still well below the 6.48 million units sold in 2006.

New construction home sales will continue to decline. According to the Association, new-home sales were reported at 770,000 for 2007, and are projected to decline to 669,000 this year before rising to 730,000 in 2009, but well below the 1.05 million in 2006.

In an early January speech, Daniel H. Mudd, chief executive of the mortgage finance company Fannie Mae, said home prices would "perhaps begin to gain modestly" in 2010. However, The National Association of Realtors (NAR) has a more positive prognostication that by the end of 2008 or early in 2009 most markets will start seeing appreciation once again.      

SIRVA does suggest companies put the appropriate controls in place to reduce risk and manage program performance at both the departure and destination locations. The following 12 best practices will help companies provide the policy framework so that transferees price and market their homes so they have a greater probability of selling their homes to an outside buyer and not have them go into inventory.

• Use qualified agents:  Use a network of qualified brokers, such as those found in SIRVA's Preferred Broker Network, to ensure transferees receive the right expertise and the best value when selling their home in the current real estate market. Using a qualified and "relocation experienced" broker is critical because if a home is listed at an incorrect price or without adequate marketing support, it is unlikely to find a timely buyer at the optimal sales price.

• Require two broker price options/broker market analyses: Multiple broker price options will help establish the most accurate selling price, which is key to quickly selling a home. Because market activity steadily falls after the first few weeks a home is on the market, pricing realistically from the beginning will attract more potential buyers.

• Delay appraisals: Delay appraisals to provide the opportunity to market a home before incurring appraisal costs. This provides more data for appraisers to use in value determination, sets more realistic value expectations, and lowers home sale cost and risk.

• Support mandatory marketing periods: Require transferees to list their homes and market them effectively for a mandatory period of time (at least 60 days) in order to increase, not only the number of amended-value sales, but also the opportunities to generate outside sales with no appraisals needed.

• Establish list-price caps:  Establish list-price caps to prevent over-listing during the property's initial exposure to the market, which is one of the most common reasons a home sits on the market. Make sure that your company's policy language specifically states that a home may not be listed at more than 105% of the average of the two most-probable sales prices from the broker market analyses. More and more companies are now going to 104% or even 103%. The list price should also be adjusted based on changes in market conditions and/or receipt of the appraised value offer.

• Modify a BVO/BVX to AVO/AVX:  In down real estate markets, some homes simply will not sell-even when transferees do everything right. Offer a guaranteed buyout after 90, 120 or 150 days to ensure the home will not be on the market past a certain time frame. This will eliminate delays in a transferee's relocation schedule, diminish transferee frustration from not selling his or her home or even prevent a cancelled relocation.

The other six best practices will be posted later today, so stay tuned. 

This March SIRVA University, SIRVA Relocation’s annual conference exploring corporate relocation industry trends and professional development, played host to 150 of the nation’s top relocation industry executives. The event, which was held at the Westin Kierland Resort in Scottsdale, Ariz., provided an exclusive forum for industry insiders to discuss vital, ongoing and emerging industry issues with experts
and colleagues.

Attendees included representatives from human resources, domestic and global relocation, procurement and supply chain departments from more than 75
different companies.

”Our industry is facing a lot of challenges, and SIRVA University provides an opportunity for human resource and relocation professionals/specialists to gather and discuss best practices and practical solutions,” noted Mike McMahon, president, SIRVA Relocation.

This year, conference roundtables and educational sessions covered topics ranging from tips for promoting relocation programs within an organization, home loss-on-sale assistance to relocation trends in China. Additional sessions addressed relocation fundamentals, such as policy trends and best practices, and provided a comprehensive history of the industry—on both a domestic and global scale.

“The educational roundtables in particular were an opportune time for attendees to interact directly with SIRVA executives and fellow relocation professionals,”
said McMahon. “And the keynote speakers were incredibly well received by all.”

SIRVA University Presentations Available Online

Those who were unable to attend this year’s event can download SIRVA University presentations and event images at www.sirvauniversity.com/agenda.asp. Individuals can also download audio recordings of the various sessions to hear them as they were presented, including question-and-answer sessions. Individuals seeking more information on SIRVA University 2008 can e-mail sirvau@sirva.com. If you'd like more information about SIRVA or corporate relocation consulting visit: www.sirva.com.